Greifeneder, ElkeLarsen, BenteLarsen, BirgerLund, HaakonSkov, Mette2025-09-242025-09-242014Ayres, M.-L. (2005), “Case Studies in implementing Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records [FRBR]: AustLit and MusicAustralia”, The Australian Library Journal, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 43–54. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2012), “Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1”, available at: http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Gligorov, R. (2012), “User-generated Metadata in Audio-visual Collections”, in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 139–144. Lund, H.; Bogers, T.; Larsen, B & Marianne Lykke (2013), “CHAOS: User-driven Development of a Metadata Scheme for Radio Broadcast Archives”, in Proceedings of the iConference 2013, pp. 990–994. Huurnink, B., Hollink, L., van den Heuvel, W. and Rijke, M. de (2010), “Search behavior of media professionals at an audiovisual archive: A transaction log analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, Vol. 61 No. 6, pp. 1180–1197. ISMIR – The International Society for Music Information Retrieval (2014), available at: http://www.ismir.net/. Kanai, K. (2013), “Differentiation of Metadata Elements Based on Users’ Music Information Needs: Focusing on FRBR, FRAD and Variations”, LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE No. 70, pp. 89–118. Kim, J., Oard, D.W. and Soergel, D. (2003), “Searching Large Collections of Recorded Speech: A Preliminary Study”, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 330–339. Kreutzfeldt, J. (2012), “Street Cries and the urban refrain: A methodological investigation of street cries”, Sound Effects, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 62–80. LARM.fm blog (2014), available at: http://larm.blogs.ku.dk/about-larm/. Lee, J.H. (2010), “Analysis of user needs and information features in natural language queries seeking music information”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, Vol. 61 No. 5, pp. 1025–1045. Stockfelt, O., Lønstrup, A. & Sangild, T. (2012), “Radiolab - three different approaches”, SoundEffects - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Sound and Sound Experience, Vol. 2 No. 1. Riley, J. (2011), “Leveraging the FRBR model for music discovery and data sharing: Autobiographical note”, OCLC Systems & Services, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 175–189. Saldaña, J. and Miles, M.B. (2013-2014), The coding manual for qualitative researchers + qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Skov, M. and Lykke, M. (2012), “Unlocking Radio Broadcasts: User Needs in Sound Retrieval”, in Proceedings of the 4th Information Interaction in Context Symposium, ACM, New York, USA, pp. 298–301. Vainio, T., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Kaakinen, A., Kärkkäinen, T. and Lehikoinen, J. (2009), “User Needs for Metadata Management in Mobile Multimedia Content Services”, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Technology, Application & Systems, ACM, New York, USA, pp. 51:1‐51:8.https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/5360This paper examines what metadata schemes are needed for radio material using the example of the LARM project. Based on several user studies in 2011, a metadata scheme has been implemented, which consists of three layers: archival metadata, LARM metadata and project-specific metadata. In late 2013 follow-up online interviews assessed the adoption of the metadata schemes and users’ understanding of the underlying philosophy. The interviews showed two things: first, despite being involved in building the scheme up, participants used the current metadata scheme on a trial and error basis and did rarely understand the underlying philosophy. Secondly, participants showed a surprisingly high accountability working with metadata meaning that archive providers should worry less about misuse of metadata and instead embrace user participation.enAttribution 3.0 Unportedhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/The least common denominator does not satisfy user’s needs: metadata schemes for digital audio archivesArticlehttp://conference.ifla.org/ifla80/open accessmetadataaudiouser-generated contentinformation behavioure-infrastructure