Tarver, HannahZavalina, OksanaPhillips, Mark2025-09-242025-09-2420161. Hartman, C.N. & K.R. Murray. (February 2010). Optimizing the user experience in a rapid development framework: final project report, February 2010. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc32974/ 2. http://www.library.unt.edu/policies/other/open-source-software-policy 3. https://github.com/unt-libraries/ 4. http://www.library.unt.edu/policies/other/locally-created-cataloging-and-metadata-records-rights-policy 5. Tarver, H. (2010). Better guidelines, better functionality: how metadata supports the cycle of system improvement at the University of North Texas. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, pp. 165-176. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc29323/ 6. http://www.library.unt.edu/digital-projects-unit/minimally-viable-records 7. http://www.library.unt.edu/digital-projects-unit/quick-start-metadata-guide 8. http://www.library.unt.edu/digital-projects-unit/input-guidelines-descriptive-metadata 9. http://www.library.unt.edu/digital-projects-unit/project-specific-guidelines-and-documents 10. http://digital2.library.unt.edu/untl.xsd 11. https://github.com/unt-libraries/pyuntl 12. http://digital2.library.unt.edu/vocabularies/ 13. https://github.com/unt-libraries/django-controlled-vocabularies 14. http://digital2.library.unt.edu/name/ 15. https://github.com/unt-libraries/django-name 16. Tarver, H., L. Waugh, M.E. Phillips, & W. Hicks. (2013). Implementing name authority control into institutional repositories: a staged approach. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc172365/ 17. Waugh, L., H. Tarver, & M.E. Phillips. (2014). Introducing Name Authority into an ETD Collection. Library Management, 35(4/5), pp. 271-283. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc279706/ 18. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ScholarlyWorks/ 19. http://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/UNTETD/ 20. http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/ 21. Tarver, H. & M.E. Phillips. (July 2013). Lessons learned in implementing the Extended Date/Time Format in a large digital library. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, pp. 60-70. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc174739/ 22. http://digital2.library.unt.edu/edtf/ 23. https://github.com/unt-libraries/django-edtf 24. https://github.com/unt-libraries/edtf-validate 25. Zavalina, O.L., & P. Kizhakkethil. (2015). Exploration of metadata change in a digital repository. Proceedings of iConference 2015, Newport Beach, California. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503265/ 26. Zavalina, O.L., P. Kizhakkethil, D. Alemneh, M. Phillips, & H. Tarver. (2015). Building a framework of metadata change to support knowledge management. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 14 (1), 1-16. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc505014/ 27. Tarver, H., O.L. Zavalina, M. Phillips, D. Alemneh, & S. Shakeri. (2014). How descriptive metadata changes in the UNT Libraries’ Collections: a case study. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, pp. 43-52. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc406345/ 28. Berners-Lee, Tim. (July 7, 2006) “Linked Data,” W3C. http://www.w3org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html 29. http://digital2.library.unt.edu/vocabularies/agent-qualifiers/ 30. http://www.loc.gov/marc/relators/relators.html 31. http://digital2.library.unt.edu/vocabularies/relation-qualifiers/ 32. http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/5710This paper presents a case study of the work carried out by the University of North Texas (UNT) Libraries and the intersection of metadata modeling, metadata input rules and documentation, metadata quality assessments, and technology to empower metadata editors to create high-quality metadata. Further, the examples illustrate how each of the pieces has informed the development of the others. The goal of the paper is to provide a cohesive overview of how documentation, information organization, metadata, and technological infrastructure function together in large digital collections to address multiple needs.Cette communication présente une étude de cas à partir du travail effectué par l’Université du Texas du Nord (University of North Texas, UNT) et l’intersection de la modélisation des métadonnées, des règles de saisie des métadonnées et leur documentation, des évaluations de la qualité des métadonnées, et de la technologie pour habiliter les éditeurs de métadonnées à créer des métadonnées de haute qualité. De plus, les exemples illustrent comment chacune de ces briques a façonné le développement des autres. L’objectif de cette communication est de fournir une vue d’ensemble cohérente sur la manière dont la documentation, l’organisation de l’information, les métadonnées et les infrastructures technologiques fonctionnent ensemble dans les grandes collections numériques pour répondre à des besoins multiples.fraAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Articlehttp://2016.ifla.org/open accessMetadata creationmetadata documentationtechnical specificationsdigital collections