CC BY 4.0International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA)Bothma, Theo J.D.2023-11-242010-08-132023-11-242010-08-13https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/3114In this report, the findings of 2010 research are analysed and comparisons are made with the 2007 Report, where possible. The previous Reports in this series were branded as the IFLA/FAIFE World Report since the emphasis was primarily on FAIFE-related issues. At the request of IFLA Headquarters (HQ) the questionnaire was expanded considerably, as explained below, to include non-FAIFE-related issues. IFLA HQ therefore decided that the Report should be rebranded as the IFLA World Report. The current Report nevertheless still has a strong focus on FAIFE-related issues. Data collection for the World Report 2010 started in April 2009 and continued until the end of 2009, with a number of countries asking for extension into 2010. Data for the individual country reports therefore to a very large extent reflect the situation as in 2009. Therefore, in the comparative tables, the 2009 date was kept since this is the more accurate date for the data from most countries.enhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Subject::Intellectual freedomSubject::CensorshipSubject::Internet censorshipSubject::LibrariesIFLA World Report 2010 (Analysis and Conclusions)IFLA/FAIFE World Report Series Vol VIIIFlagship PublicationsInternational Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA)