Caizzi, Carolyn2025-09-242025-09-242017Aguilar Moreno E.; Ghezzi, A.; Tallacchini, M.; Guimarães Pereia, Ã. (2014). Digital Memories: Ethical Perspectives. Summary report on the workshop held at JRC Ispra, Italy. 16th - 17th January 2014. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC90216 Berger, S. (2009). The Evolving Ethics of Preservation: Redefining Practices and Responsibilities in the 21st Century. The Serials Librarian, 57(1-2), 57-68, doi:10.1080/03615260802669086 Danielson, E. (1989). The Ethics of Access. The American Archivist, 52(1), 52-62. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293312 Dingwall, G. (2004). Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith. The American Archivist. 67(1), 11-30. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4 Houston, R. (1999). The Trusts: Librarian Education and the Learned Professions. (Doctoral Dissertation). doi:10.1.1.42.6101 Houston, R. (2013). Archival Ethics and the Professionalization of Archival Enterprise. Journal of Information Ethics, 22(2), 46-60. doi: 10.3172/JIE.22.2.46 Kirschenbaum, M. (2009). Where Computer Science and Cultural Studies Collide. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(20). Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/where-computer-science-and/14806 Murkutu. (n.d.) Retrieved May 7, 2017, from website http://mukurtu.org/about/ Reveal Digital. (n.d.) Retrieved May 10, 2017, from website http://revealdigital.com/how-it-works/ Robertson, T. (2016, March 20; 2016, August 15; 2016, October 12). Digitization: just because you can doesn’t mean you should; Update on On Our Backs and Reveal Digital; Concerns about Reveal Digital’s statement about On Our Backs. Blog postings retrieved from http://tararobertson.ca/2016/oob/ Smith, A. (2007) Valuing Preservation. Library Trends, 56(1), 4–25. doi:10.1353/lib.2007.0059 Whaanga H., Bainbridge, D., Anderson, M., Scrivener K., Cader P., Roa, T. & Keegan, T. (2015). He Matapihi Mā Mua, Mō Muri: The Ethics, Processes, and Procedures Associated with the Digitization of Indigenous Knowledge—The Pei Jones Collection. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(5-6), 520-547. doi:10.1080/01639374.2015.1009670https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/6097In the past few years at digital library conferences, there have been more sessions and presentations devoted to librarians and technologists taking more critical approaches to their job responsibilities and activities. A shared understanding that the technology libraries use to present collections online is not neutral or passive and easily hides all the decisions that go into selection, digitization, and presenting collections online, has surfaced. Given that the presentation of cultural heritage content online inevitably displays bias, how to present it without being exploitative is a fine line and requires librarians to be arbiters of ethical considerations. Although this theme of ethical considerations has emerged as a focus in digital library conferences fairly recently, the theme of ethical considerations as part of the profession is not new as evidenced in library science literature, especially in the archives and preservation literature of the past 30 years. This paper will give a brief overview of the literature and examples of projects where digital librarians have considered the ethics surrounding access to and preservation of cultural heritage content.enAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Articlehttps://www.ifla.org/node/11319open accessEthicsdigitizationpreservationaccessarchives