Brungs, JuliaWintermans, Vincent2025-09-242025-09-242016http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/39303/12458320743Bibliography.pdf/Bibliography.pdf Kowalski, Wojciech, “Types of Claims for Recovery of Lost Cultural Property,” in Czubek, Grazyna and Kosiewski, Piotr (eds.), Displaced Cultural Assets: The Case of Western Europe and the Problems of Central and Eastern European Countries in the 20th Century, Warsaw: Stefan Batory Foundation/Publishing House TRIO, 2004; reprinted in MUSEUM International, ‘Protection and Restitution’, no. 228, vol. 57, no. 4, Paris: UNESCO, 2005. Roehrenbeck, Carol A. (2010) "Repatriation of Cultural Property–Who Owns the Past? An Introduction to Approaches and to Selected Statutory Instruments," International Journal of Legal Information: Vol. 38: Iss. 2, Article 11. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/ijli/vol38/iss2/11 Prott, L.V. “Repatriation of Cultural Property”, University of British Columbia Law Review, Special Issue: Material Culture in Flux: Law and Policy of Repatriation of Cultural Property, 1995. Greenfield, J. ‘The Return of cultural treasures’, 3rd edition, Cambridge, 2007.https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/5842The goal of this paper: (1) to give examples of activities in UNESCO’s Memory of the World Programme that can count as instances of ‘reconstitution’ as defined in UNESCO’s 2015 Recommendation on Documentary Heritage; (2) to encourage a discussion amongst IFLA experts on what role IFLA should play in the digital ‘reconstitution’ discussion. This ties in with the IFLA’s Key Initiative 3.2.2: Instigate debate and exchange of ideas to explore collection and access issues for libraries in digital / virtual repatriation of documentary cultural heritage content.enAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Articlehttp://2016.ifla.org/open accessDigital unificationcultural heritageUNESCOMemory of the World