DeMars, J. MichaelRoll, Ann2025-09-242025-09-242016Beard, Colin, and David Bawden. "University Libraries and the Postgraduate Student: Physical and Virtual Spaces." New Library World 113, no. 9/10 (2012): 439-447. Berry, John N., III. "The Weeding War." Library Journal 138, no. 18 (November 2013): 10. California State University. Libraries of the Future: CSU LA Basin Pilot Project For Developing Cost-Effective Library Services and Resources for Student and Faculty Success in the 21st Century. Long Beach: California State University, 2013. https://www.calstate.edu/library/documents/LOFT_Recommendations_Report_v1_0.pdf. Cottrell, Terrance Luther. "Weeding Worries, Part 1: Books." The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances 26, no. 3 (2013): 98-102. Dubicki, Eleonora. "Weeding: Facing the Fears." Collection Building 27, no. 4 (2008): 132-135. Ehret Snyder, Cynthia. "Data-Driven Deselection: Multiple Point Data Using a Decision Support Tool in an Academic Library." Collection Management 39, no. 1 (2014): 17-31. Handis, Michael W. "Practical Advice for Weeding in Small Academic Libraries." Collection Building 26, no. 3 (2007): 84-87. Juskiewicz, Scott, and Betsy Harper Garlish. "Collaborating with Faculty to Weed an Entire Science and Engineering Book Collection." Chap. 21 in Library Collection Development for Professional Programs: Trends and Best Practices, by Sara Holder, 361-374. Hershey: Information Science Reference, 2013. Lewis, David W. "From Stacks to the Web: The Transformation of Academic Library Collecting." College & Research Libraries 74, no. 2 (March 2013): 159-176. McKinzie, Steve. "Bad Metaphors and Good: Why Weeding the Collection isn't Really Weeding at All." Against the Grain 25, no. 3 (June 2013): 38. Metz, Paul, and Cary Gray. "Public Relations and Library Weeding." The Journal of Academic Librarianship 31, no. 3 (May 2005): 273-279. Ruschoff, Carlen. "Library Collections and Library Users: Trading Spaces." Technicalities 32, no. 5 (September/October 2012): 1-9. Soma, Amy K., and Lisa M. Sjoberg. "More Than Just Low-Hanging Fruit: A Collaborative Approach to Weeding in Academic Libraries." Collection Management 36, no. 1 (2010): 17-28.https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/5916Weeding is often an emotionally charged topic for both librarians and faculty. However, a print collection needs weeding in order to be stronger and more relevant. Despite the merits of deselection, the prospect of discarding books often makes the campus community nervous, concerned, and defensive. At California State University, Fullerton’s (CSUF) Pollak Library, librarians were preparing for a large-scale monograph weeding project. The library faculty and administration grappled with how to productively and efficiently involve the large CSUF teaching faculty in the weeding process, knowing that many in the campus community were very concerned about the project. Staff from the library systems department were tasked with developing an innovative web-based tool that would enable faculty to easily provide feedback on deselection candidates on a title-by-title basis. The initial pilot, in which 1700 titles slated for deselection were loaded into the interface for faculty feedback, resulted in faculty requesting that nearly every title be retained in the collection. A second load of over 30,000 titles had very different results. This paper discusses CSUF’s weeding process, the creation of the deselection tool, and the design of the user interface. It also analyzes the results of faculty feedback entered via the weeding interface, comparing results from the initial pilot to the larger, ongoing project.engAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Articlehttp://2016.ifla.org/open accessWeedingdeselectioncollection managementlibrary faculty collaborationcampus politics