Taming a wicked problem: Meeting academic standards, institutional goals and professional expectations in online courses
| dc.audience | Audience::Audience::Information Technology Section | |
| dc.audience | Audience::Audience::Continuing Professional Development and Workplace Learning Section | |
| dc.audience | Audience::Audience::Education and Training Section | |
| dc.conference.sessionType | Education and Training with Continuing Professional Development and Workplace Learning and Information Technology | |
| dc.conference.venue | Greater Columbus Convention Center (GCCC) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Corrall, Sheila | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-24T08:36:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-24T08:36:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.description.abstract | E-learning and online education have the potential to transform professional learning by widening access and participation, customizing and personalizing learning experiences, building communities of interest and practice, developing professional expertise and global competence, promoting diverse perspectives and inclusive behaviours, and supporting evidence-based reflective practitioners. However, online education programs have had a mixed reception; although popular with students, they have been disparaged for low standards and poor quality, and dismissed as academically weak and professionally unsatisfactory for subjects where hands-on experiential learning is regarded essential for theoretical understanding to be translated into working knowledge and practical skills. The present case study challenges such assumptions, showing that online asynchronous courses in library and information science can not only provide rich and rewarding experiences for learners and teachers, but can also result in quality enhancement of their traditional face-to-face counterparts by transferring methods developed for the virtual learning environment to the onsite classroom. The study describes the course development process adopted and the designs produced, and reflects on the experiences of course delivery, drawing on student evaluations and instructor reflections collected over several terms. Eight factors are judged critical to the success of online courses: upfront advice and consultancy from an instructional designer; ongoing help and support from an instructional technologist; breadth and depth of subject matter expertise; learning from best practices in the field; systematic evaluation and feedback from student learners; annual review and reflection by the instructor; an accessible and flexible course management system; and a functional and reliable information technology infrastructure. Library and information science educators of the future need to move beyond the T-shaped competency model of one area of profound specialist expertise supported by generalist capabilities to the Pi-shaped or H-shaped model of double-stemmed expertise to meet the academic and professional demands of learning in dynamic online environments. | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | ALA (2016, June) Searchable database of ALA-accredited programs. Retrieved June 14, 2016, from http://www.ala.org/CFApps/lisdir/index.cfm. Alman, S. W., Tomer, C., & Pilarsky, K. L. (2003). The University of Pittsburgh’s School of Information Sciences distance education: Past, present, and future. In D. D. Barron (Ed.), Benchmarks in distance education: The LIS experience (pp. 215-231). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. Barron, D. D. (Ed.) (2003). Benchmarks in distance education: The LIS experience. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. Berrett, D. (2015, September 25). The unwritten rules of college. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 62(4), A26-A29. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. Branch, J. L., & de Groot, J. (2013). “I love being able to have my colleagues around the world at my fingertips”: Connecting teacher-librarians in the 21st century. In A. Sigal (Ed.), Advancing library education: Technological innovation and instructional design (pp. 110-126). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4108/978-1-4666-3688-0.ch007. Buchanan, E., Xie, H., Brown, M., & Wolfram, D. (2001). A systematic study of web-based and traditional instruction in an MLIS program: Success factors and implications for curriculum design. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 42(4), 274-288. Burnett, G., Burnett, K., & Latham, D. (2003). Distributed learning in the Florida State University School of Information Studies. In D. D. Barron (Ed.), Benchmarks in distance education: The LIS experience (pp. 29-51). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. Camillus, J. C. (2008). Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 98-106. Chow, A. (2003). Synchronous and asynchronous interactions: Convenient and content. In A. Sigal (Ed.), Advancing library education: Technological innovation and instructional design (pp. 127-140). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-3688.0.ch008. Cooke, N. A. (2012). Professional development 2.0 for librarians: Developing an online personal learning network (PLN). Library Hi Tech News, 29(3), 1-9. Corcoran, M., & McGuinness, C. (2014). Keeping ahead of the curve: Academic librarians and continuing professional development in Ireland. Library Management, 35(3), 175-198. doi:10.1108/LM-06-2013-0048. Corrall, S. (2010). Educating the academic librarian as a blended professional: A review and case study. Library Management, 31(8/9), 567-593. doi:10.1108/01435121011093360. Corrall, S. (2011). Continuing professional development and workplace learning. In P. Dale, J. Beard & M. Holland (Eds.), University libraries and digital learning environments (pp. 239-258). Farnham, UK: Ashgate. Del Bosque, D. (2013). Will you be my friend: Social networking in the workplace. New Library World, 114(9/10), 428-442. doi:10.1108/NLW-04-2013-0033. Demirkan, H., & Spohrer, J. (2015). T-shaped innovators: Identifying the right talent to support service innovation. Research-Technology Management, 58(5), 12-15 Frey, B. A., Alman, S. W., Barron, D., & Steffens, A. (2004). Student satisfaction with the online MLIS program at the University of Pittsburgh. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 45(2), 82-97. Gonzalez, S. R., Kennedy, K., & Cenzer, P. (2007). E-education: Does an online degree make a difference to academic library employers? ACRL 13th National Conference, March 29-April 1, Baltimore, MD (pp. 11-17). Retrieved June 14, 2016, from http://www.ala.org/acrl/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/baltimore/baltimore. Haigh, M. (2007). Divided by a common degree program? Profiling online and face-to-face information science students. Education for Information, 25(2), 93-110. Hanson, W., & Williams, C. (2012). E-learning for professionals. Bristol, UK: Professional Associations Research Network (PARN). Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55. Retrieved June 14, 2016, from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0848.pdf. Islam, M. S., Kunifuji, S., Hayama, T., & Miura, M. (2011). Towards exploring a global scenario of e-learning in library and information science schools. International Information and Library Review, 43(1), 15-22. doi:10.1016/j.iilr.2011.01.004. Kazmer, M. M., Gibson, A. N., & Shannon, K. (2013). Perceptions and experiences of e-learning among on-campus students. In A. Segal (Ed.), Advancing library education: Technological innovation and instructional design (pp. 45-64). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018-1-4666-3688-0.ch004. Khanova, J. (2013). Faculty experience of online teaching. In A. Sigal (Ed.), Advancing library education: Technological innovation and instructional design (pp. 27-44). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-3688.0.ch003. Kochtanek, T. R., Seavey, C., & Wedman, J. (2003). Distributed learning: The development of courses and programs in LIS at the University of Missouri-Columbia. In D. D. Barron (Ed.), Benchmarks in distance education: The LIS experience (pp. 161-168). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. Li, R. (2013). Traditional to hybrid: Social media’s role in reshaping instruction in higher education. In A. Segal (Ed.), Advancing library education: Technological innovation and instructional design (pp. 65-90). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018-1-4666-3688-0.ch005. Montague, R., & Pluzhenskaia, M. (2007). Web-based information science education (WISE): Collaboration to explore and expand quality in LIS online education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 48(1), 36-51. Oliver, M. (2000). Evaluating online teaching and learning. Information Services & Use, 20(2/3), 83-94. Sample, M. (2011, May 31). Planning a class with backward design [blog post]. ProfHacker: Teaching, tech, and productivity, The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved June 14, 2016, from http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/planning-a-class-with-backward-design/33625. Shapiro, D. (2013). The Master’s in Library and Information Studies Program via Distance at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In A. Sigal (Ed.), Advancing library education: Technological innovation and instructional design (pp. 222-228). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-3688.0.ch015. Sigal, A. (Ed.) (2013). Advancing library education: Technological innovation and instructional design. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. Stranack, K. (2012). The connected librarian: Using social media for "Do It Yourself" professional development. Partnership: the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 7(1). Retrieved June 14, 2016, from https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/article/download/1924/2513. Swigger, K., & Turner, P. (2003). Partnership in multisite distance learning: A cooperative program for master’s degrees in librarianship in North Texas. In D. D. Barron (Ed.), Benchmarks in distance education: The LIS experience (pp. 185-197). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. Vai, M., & Sosulski, K. (2011). Essentials of online course design: A standards-based guide. New York; Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Westbrook, L. (2002). LIS distance education: Modes and plans. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 43(1), 62-68. doi:10.2307/40323988. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD (Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development). Wilde, M. L., & Epperson, A. (2006). A survey of alumni of LIS distance education programs: Experiences and implications. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(3), 238-250. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.02.013. Winkelmes, M. (2016). The unwritten rules: Decode your assignments and decipher what’s expected of you. Las Vegas, NV: Transparency in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Project, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Retrieved June 14, 2016, from https://www.unlv.edu/sites/default/files/page_files/27/Provost-Student-TransparentAssgntTemplate-2016.pdf. | |
| dc.identifier.relatedurl | http://2016.ifla.org/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/5862 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Information technology | |
| dc.subject.keyword | instructor competencies | |
| dc.subject.keyword | online education | |
| dc.subject.keyword | professional development | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Web-based instruction | |
| dc.subject.keyword | workplace learning | |
| dc.title | Taming a wicked problem: Meeting academic standards, institutional goals and professional expectations in online courses | en |
| dc.type | Article | |
| ifla.Unit | Section:Information Technology Section | |
| ifla.Unit | Section::Continuing Professional Development and Workplace Learning Section | |
| ifla.Unit | Section::Education and Training Section | |
| ifla.oPubId | https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/1482/ |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1