Intersectional and intermodal: Making sexual health information accessible to LGBTQ+ Deaf people

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Introduction The Deaf community is culturally and linguistically distinct, with its own history and traditions. Within this framework, Deafness is viewed as a cultural difference and not a disability, and sign languages are a cornerstone of Deaf culture. Deaf people experience discrimination within hearing dominant culture, which often views Deaf culture, including sign languages, as inferior. This type of systemic discrimination is referred to as audism. LGBTQ+ Deaf Sexual health information Barriers to providing sexual health information to Deaf people are linguistic and systemic. Deaf people in general have a lower rate of literacy and have greater trust for visual information originating within the Deaf community. Most sexual health information originates in spoken language which is harder to disseminate to Deaf people who prefer sign languages — a language modality with a distinct structure and culture. The result is a lack of accessible information and higher prevalence of STIs. Deaf LGBTQ+ people are at the intersection between at least two cultures, each with its own cultural norms. In sexual health information these cultural norms may conflict — the greater levels of taboo which already around LGBTQ+ sexual practices are exacerbated with the need to represent these visually, for example. Further issues can arise when the information is supplied via an interpreter whose personal values may interfere. Conclusion In this presentation we will discuss the main cultural and intersectional challenges in designing sexual health information for LGBTQ+ Deaf people, and provide recommendations. We will support our suggestions with recent data from the US D-P@RK study with Deaf MSM, and with examples of good practice from the Coalition SIDA des sourds du Québec. The authors believe that this information will usefully inform the work of health information providers working with Deaf LGBTQ+ people.

Description

Keywords

Citation

1. Ringo A. Understanding Deafness: Not everyone wants to be 'fixed' [Internet]. Washington DC: The Atlantic; 2013 [cited 2017 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/08/ understanding-deafness-not-everyone-wants-to-be-fixed/278527/. 2. Padden C, Humphries T. Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1988. 3. Ladd P. Understanding Deaf culture: in search of Deafhood. Clevedon, England; Buffalo: Multilingual Matters; 2003. 502 p. 4. Bauman H-DL. Audism: Exploring the metaphysics of oppression. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2004;9(2):239-46. 5. Sadler GR, Huang JT, Padden CA, Elion L, Galey TA, Gunsauls DC, et al. Bringing health care information to the Deaf community. J Cancer Educ. 2001;16(2):105-8. 6. Bat-Chava Y, Martin D, Kosciw JG. Barriers to HIV/AIDS knowledge and prevention among deaf and hard of hearing people. AIDS Care. 2005;17(5):623-34. 7. Ferndale D, Watson B, Munro L. An exploration of how health care professionals understand experiences of deafness. Crit Pub Health. 2016:1-13. 8. Getch YQ, Young M, Denny G. Sexuality education for students who are deaf: Current practices and concerns. Sex Disabil. 1998;16(4):269-81. 9. Heiman E, Haynes S, McKee M. Sexual health behaviors of Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) users. Disabil Health J. 2015;8(4):579-85. 10. InterGroup Services, Inc. (IGS) for Associated Black Charities. 2003. An Assessment of the Needs of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Persons with HIV in the Baltimore Area. Baltimore, MD: IGS; 2003. Available from: http://www.baltimorepc.org/v2/files/pdf/DeafReport.pdf 11. Iantaffi A, Benoit, C, Rosser SBR, Rose S. D-P@RK Study: Overcoming health disparities to HIV testing for Deaf MSM through the internet. University of Minnesota; 2016. (Unpublished report). 12. Schaad A. An Interview with three deaf lesbians: Intersectionality and saliency of identity variables [dissertation]: Wright State University; 2016. 13. Morris M., Siegel J. Academic librarians and their LGBTQ+ patrons. Poster session presented at ACRL New England; 2017 May 12; Burlington, United States. Available from: http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R/-?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=146486. 14. Hawkins BW, Morris M, Nguyen T, Siegel J, Vardell E. Advancing the conversation: Next steps in LGBTQ health sciences librarianship. J Med Libr Assoc. Forthcoming.