Quality open publishing: The role of libraries in supporting and sustaining new publications
| dc.audience | Audience::Library Publishing Special Interest Group | |
| dc.conference.sessionType | Library Publishing SIG | |
| dc.conference.venue | Megaron Athens International Conference Centre (MAICC) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bradley, Fiona | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-24T09:13:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-24T09:13:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A growing number of libraries, particularly in academic libraries, are supporting the creation of new journals, and monographs as part of their commitment to open access and open research. But in an environment where researchers are also focused on research quality, what is the role for libraries in supporting start up publications that take some time to accrue quality measures? How do we provide support to editors on alternative measures of quality, alternative metrics, and dissemination and indexing strategies? And, how do these influence the level of support libraries are willing to provide to new publications? The presentation will include case studies from the UNSW Sydney Library, a major research-intensive public university, that supports publication of three journals and that also provides expert support to researchers on publishing strategy. | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adler, R., Ewing, J., & Taylor, P. (2009). Citation Statistics: A Report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in Cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS). Statistical Science, 24(1), 1–14. Retrieved from JSTOR. Bakker, C., Chew, K., McBurney, J., Reed, D., & Aho, M. (2018). Measuring Impact With Altmetrics: Is There One Tool To Rule Them All? Retrieved from http://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/200727 Bankovsky, M. (2019). No proxy for quality: why journal rankings in political science are problematic for political theory research. Australian Journal of Political Science, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2019.1609412 Dahler-Larsen, P. (2018). Making citations of publications in languages other than English visible: On the feasibility of a PLOTE-index. Research Evaluation, 27(3), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy010 Davis, P. (2013, June 20). The Rise and Fall of PLOS ONE's Impact Factor (2012 = 3.730). Retrieved June 11, 2019, from The Scholarly Kitchen website: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/06/20/the-rise-and-fall-of-plos-ones-impact-factor-2012-3-730/ Dion, M. L., Sumner, J. L., & Mitchell, S. M. (2018). Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields. Political Analysis, 26(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.12 DORA – San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2019, from https://sfdora.org/ Elsevier. (n.d.). Content Policy and Selection. Retrieved June 11, 2019, from https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/how-scopus-works/content/content-policy-and-selection ERA evaluation. (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2019, from https://www.griffith.edu.au/research/research-services/research-policy-performance/era/era-evaluation Federation Of Finnish Learned Societies, Information, T. C. F. P., Publishing, T. F. A. F. S., Universities Norway, & European Network For Research Evaluation In The Social Sciences And The Humanities. (2019). Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication. 621757 Bytes. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7887059 Jensenius, F. R., Htun, M., Samuels, D. J., Singer, D. A., Lawrence, A., & Chwe, M. (2018). The Benefits and Pitfalls of Google Scholar. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(4), 820–824. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800094X Latchman, D. (2018, October 10). Why Birkbeck is leaving the UK rankings race. Retrieved June 11, 2019, from Times Higher Education (THE) website: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/why-birkbeck-leaving-uk-rankings-race Leiden manifesto for research Metrics. (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2019, from Leiden manifesto for research Metrics website: http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/ Library Publishing Coalition. (n.d.). Libray Publishing Director 2019. Retrieved June 11, 2019, from Library Publishing Coalition website: https://librarypublishing.org/directory-year/directory-2019/ Mårtensson, P., Fors, U., Wallin, S.-B., Zander, U., & Nilsson, G. H. (2016). Evaluating research: A multidisciplinary approach to assessing research practice and quality. Research Policy, 45(3), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.009 Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002 Mavros, L. (2019, March 29). UNSW research has the highest impact on society, new assessment shows [Text]. Retrieved June 11, 2019, from UNSW Newsroom website: https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/general/unsw-research-has-highest-impact-society-new-assessment-shows Raju, R. (2017). From green to gold to diamond: open access’s return to social justice. Presented at the IFLA World Library and Information congress, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/2220/ Rimmert, C., Bruns, A., Lenke, C., & Taubert, N. C. (2017). ISSN-Matching of Gold OA Journals (ISSN-GOLD-OA) 2.0. Retrieved from https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2913654 Rodrigues, R. S., & Abadal, E. (2014). Ibero-American journals in Scopus and Web of Science. Learned Publishing, 27(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1087/20140109 Skinner, K., Lippincott, S., Speer, J., & Walters, T. (2014). Library-as-Publisher: Capacity Building for the Library Publishing Subfield. https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0017.207 Testa, J. (n.d.). Journal Selection Process. Retrieved June 6, 2019, from Clarivate Analytics website: https://clarivate.com/essays/journal-selection-process/ | |
| dc.identifier.relatedurl | https://2019.ifla.org/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/6579 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Open access | |
| dc.subject.keyword | publishing | |
| dc.subject.keyword | research | |
| dc.subject.keyword | quality | |
| dc.subject.keyword | metrics | |
| dc.title | Quality open publishing: The role of libraries in supporting and sustaining new publications | en |
| dc.type | Article | |
| ifla.Unit | Section:Library Publishing Special Interest Group | |
| ifla.oPubId | https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/2528/ |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1