Taking Stock: Organizing Open Access Operations Based on Researcher Practices
dc.audience | Audience::Acquisition and Collection Development Section | |
dc.audience | Audience::Serials and Other Continuing Resources Section | |
dc.conference.date | 16 – 17 August 2017 | |
dc.conference.place | Gdańsk (Poland) | |
dc.conference.sessionType | Satellite Meeting: Serials and Other Continuing Resources Section and Acquisition and Collection Development | |
dc.conference.title | Open Access: Action Required | |
dc.conference.venue | European Solidarity Center (ESC) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wirth, Andrea A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-24T09:17:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-09-24T09:17:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.description.abstract | In 2017, the members of the Scholarly Communication Initiatives (SCI) Department at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) developed a strategic goal for the department to “create organizational shift” at UNLV in regard to improving campus-wide knowledge of and support for open access (OA). One method by which to work toward this multi-year goal was to gain additional insight about UNLV faculty members’ support of OA by assessing their participation in OA publishing and repositories. Through direct conversations with faculty, information gleaned through liaison librarians, and questions about the IR and related services, it was clear there was already interest in OA. However, it is difficult to gauge interest at the department, college, or university level based on ad-hoc contacts alone. Understanding participation in OA at a broader organizational level could help create the desired organizational shift, via improved outreach efforts. This paper proposes that improved understanding about existing local OA practices can provide useful and strategic information for OA operational planning. It demonstrates the use of research databases, selected subject repositories, and the institutional repository, to identify local OA practices. These data inform operations through identification of potential OA advocates, and new audiences to include in OA outreach. | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Clarivate Analytics. (2017). The Future of Open Access Discovery is NOW! Retrieved from http://info.clarivate.com/openaccess. Hazzard, J., & Towery, S. (2017). Workflow Development for an Institutional Repository in an Emerging Research Institution. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 5, eP2166. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.2166 Peekhaus, W., & Proferes, N. (2015). How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access. Article Journal of Information Science, 41(5), 640–661. doi:10.1177/0165551515587855 Rowley, J., Johnson, F., Sbaffi, L., Frass, W., & Devine, E. (2017). Academics’ behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(5), 1201–1211. doi:10.1002/asi.23710 Zhang, H., Boock, M., & Wirth, A. A. (2015). It Takes More Than a Mandate: Factors That Contribute To Increased Rates of Article Deposit to an Institutional Repository. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), eP1208. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1208 | |
dc.identifier.relatedurl | https://2017.ifla.org/programme/satellite-meetings | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/6792 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject.keyword | Open access | |
dc.subject.keyword | outreach | |
dc.subject.keyword | scholarly publishing | |
dc.subject.keyword | repositories | |
dc.title | Taking Stock: Organizing Open Access Operations Based on Researcher Practices | en |
dc.type | Article | |
ifla.Unit | Section:Acquisition and Collection Development Section | |
ifla.Unit | Section::Serials and Other Continuing Resources Section | |
ifla.oPubId | https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/2089/ |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1