Research on Cooperation between the Academic Library and Research Team: Taking the Life & Medical Sciences Subject Team of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library as an Example

dc.audienceAudience::Academic and Research Libraries Section
dc.audienceAudience::Health and Bioscience Libraries Section
dc.conference.sessionTypeAcademic and Research Libraries & Health and Biosciences
dc.conference.venueMegaron Athens International Conference Centre (MAICC)
dc.contributor.authorChen, Qiaomei
dc.contributor.authorZhong, Huihui
dc.contributor.authorShen, Yaqi
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yimei
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-24T09:13:37Z
dc.date.available2025-09-24T09:13:37Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractUnder the ubiquitous knowledge environment, academic libraries are developing cooperation in the entire knowledge creation lifecycle. The Life & Medical Sciences subject team of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library (LMSST) has extensively executed its subject services since 2008 and built a good relationship with the research teams. This paper deeply expounds three cooperation modes driven by needs as follows: 1) Micro level: Subject librarians focus on individual information literacy (IL) capacity and provide information literacy improvement supports, students, teachers and researcher’s partners-enterprise employee were included as the training targets; Case 1: Cooperate to hold the “Big Data Training” summer camp, combine the research direction, cultivate research teams data awareness, data usage skills and data mining ability; Case 2: Provide information literacy supports for Innovation Alliance of Nano-medical Diagnostic Technology. 2) Meso level: Subject librarians embedded information service in the research project as the role of “information worker”. Case 3: Subject team integrated into Metabolic Science Discipline Development Strategy Research Group, assist the researchers that study in the new discipline to fully grasp the discipline situation. 3) Macro-level: Subject librarians support managers of research team to make decision based on scientific intelligence analysis. Case 4: Pharmacological and Toxicological Contribution Analysis Report of ESI in the school of Pharmacy. This paper aims to provide a reference for the cooperation between academic libraries and research teams.en
dc.identifier.citationAttis, D., & Koproske, C. (2013). Thirty trends shaping the future of academic libraries. Learned Publishing, 26(1), 18-23. doi:10.1087/20130104 Brandt, D. S. (2007). Librarians as partners in e-research. College & Research Libraries News, 68(6), 365-396. doi:10.5860/crln.68.6.7818 Carlson, J., & Kneale, R. (2011). Embedded librarianship in the research context: Navigating new waters. 2011, 72(3), 4. doi:10.5860/crln.72.3.8530 Federer, L. (2013). The librarian as research informationist: a case study. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 298-302. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.011 Janke, R., & Rush, K. L. (2014). The academic librarian as co-investigator on an interprofessional primary research team: a case study. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 31(2), 116-122. doi:10.1111/hir.12063 LaGuardia, C. (2012). Library Instruction in the Digital Age. Journal of Library Administration, 52(6-7), 601-608. doi:10.1080/01930826.2012.707956 Manus, S. J. B. (2009). LIBRARIAN IN THE CLASSROOM: AN EMBEDDED APPROACH TO MUSIC INFORMATION LITERACY FOR FIRST-YEAR UNDERGRADUATES. Notes, 66(2), 249-261. doi:10.1353/not.0.0259 Mounce, M. (2009). Academic librarian and English composition instructor collaboration: A selective annotated bibliography 1998‐2007. Reference Services Review, 37(1), 44-53. doi:10.1108/00907320910934986 O'Connor, L., Bowles-Terry, M., Davis, E., & Holliday, W. (2010). "Writing Information Literacy" Revisited Application of Theory to Practice in the Classroom. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 49(3), 225-230. doi:10.5860/rusq.49n3.225 Pinfield, S., Cox, A., & Rutter, S. (2017). Mapping the future of academic libraries: A report for SCONUL. Thompson, G. B. (2002). Information Literacy Accreditation Mandates: What They Mean for Faculty and Librarians. Library Trends, 51(2), 218. Xiao, J. (2010). Integrating information literacy into Blackboard: Librarian‐faculty collaboration for successful student learning. Library Management, 31(8/9), 654-668. doi:10.1108/01435121011093423
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttps://2019.ifla.org/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/6627
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.keywordAcademic Library
dc.subject.keywordResearch Team
dc.subject.keywordResearch Support Service
dc.subject.keywordInformation Literacy Training
dc.subject.keywordIntelligence service
dc.titleResearch on Cooperation between the Academic Library and Research Team: Taking the Life & Medical Sciences Subject Team of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library as an Exampleen
dc.typeArticle
ifla.UnitSection:Academic and Research Libraries
ifla.UnitSection::Health and Bioscience Libraries Section
ifla.oPubIdhttps://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/2576/

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
082-chen-en.pdf
Size:
353.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format