The South African Copyright Law: a historical overview and challenges to address access to knowledge issues in a country in transformation

dc.audienceAudience::Sub-Saharan Africa Regional Division
dc.conference.sessionTypeAccess to Information Network – Africa SIG
dc.conference.venueCape Town International Convention Centre
dc.contributor.authorNicholson, Denise Rosemary
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-24T08:22:35Z
dc.date.available2025-09-24T08:22:35Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides a historical overview of developments in the South African copyright law and challenges by the educational sector and libraries, to address access to knowledge issues, particularly in a country in transformation. South Africa’s current Copyright Act was enacted in 1978. Because of its colonial background, South Africa’s current copyright law was adapted from British copyright law. It also incorporated provisions from the Berne Convention. The Act has been amended several times, most notably in 1992 to categorise computer programs as a separate, distinct class of protected work. In 1997, it was amended to bring it into line with the TRIPS agreement. In 2002, it was amended to provide ‘needle-time’ rights for owners of sound recordings (embodying musical works) and performers of the musical works, to enable them to receive royalties in respect of the broadcast, or performance, of these sound recordings. Section 13 Regulations governing limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives and education have not been updated since 1978. These Regulations were an adapted version of the Agreement on Guidelines for Classroom Copying in Not-For-Profit Educational Institutions with Respect to Books and Periodicals, published in the United States House Report 94-1476 (1976). These Regulations are limited and restrictive and have become a barrier to access to information, particularly in the digital environment. This paper tracks important initiatives by the educational sector and libraries since 1998, to address access to information needs of libraries, archives, persons with sensory disabilities, educators and researchers. After successfully challenging Government proposals to amend the Copyright Regulations (1998) and the Copyright Act (2000), the educational sector and libraries have continued to lobby for more balanced copyright laws, but to date the Department of Trade and Industry has not delivered in this regard. South Africa (through the Africa Group) strongly supported the adoption of a Treaty for the Blind and Visually Impaired at the WIPO Diplomatic Conference in Marrakesh, Morocco, and on 27 June 2013 the Marrakesh Treaty was adopted. South Africa has not ratified this Treaty as yet, since it is finalising its Intellectual Property Policy and will need to amend its Copyright law before ratifying this Treaty. This Treaty has been ratified by a number of WIPO Member States to date and this has put pressure on South Africa to do the same, so that blind and visually impaired persons can benefit from the Treaty’s provisions as soon as possible. The Department of Trade and Industry needs to fast-track matters, and in the process, amend and update the copyright law. The paper will highlight the library and higher educational sectors’ initiatives and interactions with the Department of Trade and Industry in an attempt to expedite the process and to modernise the copyright legislation in the context of international treaties, WIPO’s Development Agenda, IFLA’s proposals at WIPO, and access to knowledge initiatives. The outcome and implications of proposed amendments to the copyright law will also be discussed. It is hoped that this paper will provide some guidelines for other developing countries on how to change their copyright laws to address access to knowledge and transformation issues in a digital world.en
dc.identifier.citationACA2K ‘Executive Policy Brief’ (2009). Retrieved from: http://www.aca2k.org/attachments/154_ACA2K%20South%20Africa%20EPB.pdf on 3 April 2015. Conroy, M (2006) ‘A Comparative Study of Technological Protection Measures in Copyright Law’. (Unpublished Thesis). University of South Africa, Pretoria. Retrieved from: http://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/2217 on 3 April 2015. ‘Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (1996) - Chapter 2: Bill of Rights’. Retrieved from: http://www.gov.za/documents/constitution/chapter-2-bill-rights#16 on 3 April 2015. Garnett, N (2006) ‘Automated Rights Management Systems and Copyright Limitations and Exceptions’. World Intellectual Property Organization. Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, Fourteenth Session (Geneva, May 1 to 5). Retrieved from: http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=59952 on 3 April 2015. Gray, E. and Seeber, M. (2004) ‘PICC Report on Intellectual Property Rights in the Print Industries Section (May). Retrieved from: http://www.publishsa.co.za/downloads/intellectual_property_report.pdf on 3 April 2015. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) (2011) ‘Limitations and Exceptions Worldwide’. Retrieved from: http://www.ifla.org/en/node/5864 on 3 April 2015. International Federation of Reprographic Rights Organization (IFRRO) (2001) ‘Resolution: Passage of proposed Amendments to South African Copyright Act and Ratification of the WIPO Copyright Treaty and WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, adopted by the Annual General Meeting in Cape Town’ (October). Retrieved from http://www.ifrro.org/sites/default/files/Resolution-South-Africa.pdf on 3 April 2015. International Statistical Institute (ISI) (2015) ‘Developing Countries’. Retrieved from: http://www.isi-web.org/component/content/article/5-root/root/81-developing on 3 April 2015. Kinghorn, F. (2002) ‘Towards a barrier-free society: a report on accessibility and built environments’, SAHRC Report (November). Retrieved from: http://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/Reports/towards_barrier_free_society.pdf2002.pdf on 3 April 2015. Nicholson, D. (2012) ‘Accommodating Persons with Sensory Disabilities in South African Copyright Law’. (Unpublished Master’s Dissertation). University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/10539/12525 on 4 April 2015. Nicholson, D.R. (2006) ‘Copyright - Are people with sensory-disabilities getting a fair deal? (Conference paper). 4th Pan Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning, Ocho Rios, Jamaica (30 October -3 November). Retrieved from: http://pcf4.dec.uwi.edu/viewpaper.php?id=379&print=1 on 4 April 2015. Nicholson, D.R. and Schönwetter, T (2008) ‘Copyright Limitations and Exceptions - Why They are Important for Access to Knowledge’. Retrieved from: http://www.aca2k.org/index.php?option=com_idoblog&task=viewpost&id=79&Itemid=69 on 4 April 2015. Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) (n.d.) ‘Southern African Customs Union (SACU)’. Retrieved from https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/africa/regional-economic-communities-rec/southern-african-customs-union-sacu on 5 April 2015. Rens et al. (n.d.) ‘Report on the South African Open Copyright Review’. Retrieved from: http://ip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/opencopyrightreport1.pdf on 4 April 2015. ‘SACU TIDCA Agreement with USA 16 July 2008: Cooperative Agreement between the United States of America and the Southern African Customs Union to Foster Trade, Investment and Development’ (2008). Retrieved from: http://www.sacu.int/docs/tidca/agreement.pdf on 5 April 2015. South African National Council for the Blind (SANCB) (2011) ‘Draft Document on the South African Position Regarding Copyright Limitations and Exceptions’ (13 September) (unpublished). ‘The SA Music Industry's Copyright Dilemma: Needletime’ (n.d.). Retrieved from; http://www.themarketingsite.com/knowledge/3515/the-sa-music-industrys-copyright-dilemma-needletime on 5 April 2015. Visser, C. (2006) ‘Technological Protection Measures: South Africa Goes Overboard, Overbroad’. The South African Journal of Information and Communication, (7).
dc.identifier.relatedurlhttp://conference.ifla.org/ifla81
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/5601
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.subject.keywordIntellectual property
dc.subject.keywordcopyright
dc.subject.keywordSouth Africa
dc.subject.keywordlimitations and exceptions
dc.subject.keywordaccess to knowledge
dc.titleThe South African Copyright Law: a historical overview and challenges to address access to knowledge issues in a country in transformationen
dc.typeArticle
ifla.UnitSection:Sub-Saharan Africa Regional Division
ifla.oPubIdhttps://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/1248/

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
138-nicholson-en.pdf
Size:
474.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format