Repositories and Institutional Grey Literature
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
COAR has launched a research project called “Next Generation Repositories” since 2016, which focuses on promoting itself to be research-oriented, open and conducive to innovation, so that it can facilitate the collective management of academic groups. The traditional repositories as the management of research outputs (thesis, thesis, etc.), at first, are basically in the category of “white literature”; Secondly, the publication of management on the Internet (forums, academic blogs, etc.), basically belong to the “white literature” ( The scope of White Literature). As the research data collection and management involved in the scientific research process is not fully integrated into the management domain of repositories, they are basically in the category of “grey literature”. Research data set retention and long-term management is a part of the academic practice of the discipline, and the data management problem and incorporating it into the academic practice has become a hot topic in the academic circle. The Operation management of traditional repositories is beginning a new upgrade exploration - research data management (RDM). (1) the type and data structure of grey literature in the next generation repositories; (2) the relationship among "white literature", "like white literature" and "grey literature" in knowledge chain; (3) systematic analysis of the logical relationship of "study-data-result-structure-correlation-effect-multiplexing-openness". In order to reveal the multi-dimensional relationship between institutional knowledge resources and research data, the integration of RDM organization process data association law, the key elements of multi-source heterogeneous data, and the establishment of effective knowledge links are analyzed. (4) the policy guarantee and implementation mechanism of the reuse and open utilization of institutional grey literature.
Description
Keywords
Citation
[1]Karasti H, Baker K S, Halkola E. Enriching the Notion of Data Curation in E-Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network[J]. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2006, 15(4):321-358.
[2] Wu Jianzhong.From Open Access to “Beyond Open Access”—Enlightment from “Next Generation Repositories”[J].Journal of the National Library of China,,2018,27(06):3-8.
[3]Managing Research Data.[EB/OL]. [2018-10-25].http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/mrd.aspx.
[4]Wilson J A J, Martinez-Uribe L, Fraser M A, et al. An institutional approach to developing research data management infrastructure[J]. International Journal of Digital Curation, 2011, 6(2): 274-287.
[5]Rice R, Haywood J. Research data management initiatives at University of Edinburgh[J]. International Journal of Digital Curation, 2011, 6(2): 232-244.
[6] Latham, Bethany. Research Data Management: Defining Roles, Prioritizing Services, and Enumerating Challenges[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2017,43(3):263-265..
[7] Zhang Jilong, YinShenqin ,ZhangYong,et al.Social Scientific Data Sharing and Serving—An Example of Fudan University Social Scientific Data Platfrom[J].Journal of Academic Libraries,2015,33(01):74-79.
[8] GU Liping.Data Governance: Opportunity for the Library[J].Journal of Library Science in China,,2016,42(05):40-56.
[9]]Kuk G, Davies T. The Roles of Agency and Artifacts in Assembling Open Data Complementarities[A]. Proceedings of Thirty Second International Conference on Information Systems[C], Shanghai,China,2011.
[10]Janssen M, Estevez E, Janowski T. Interoperability in Big, Open, and Linked Data--Organizational Maturity, Capabilities, and Data Portfolios[J]. Computer, 2014, 47(10):44-49.
[11] SU Xinning.Opportunities and Challenges Faced by Digital Libraries in the Era of Big Data[J].Journal of Library Science in China,2015,41(06):4-12.
[12] Liu Wei,XiaCuijuan,ZhangChunjing. Big Data and Linked Data: The Emerging Data Technology for the Future of Librarianship[J].New Technology of Library and Information Service,2013(04):2-9.
[13]Vandenbussche P Y, Atemezing G A, Poveda-Villalón M, et al. Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV): a gateway to reusable semantic vocabularies on the Web[J]. Semantic Web, 2017, 8(3): 437-452.
[14]Alonen M, Kauppinen T, Hyvönen E.Vocab.at–Automatic Linked Data Documentation And Vocabulary Usage Analysis [EB/OL].[2018-10-29].
https://seco.cs.aalto.fi/publications/submitted/alonen-et-al-vocab.pdf.
[15]Genetics N. European Open Science Cloud[J]. Nature Genetics, 2016, 48(8):821.
[16] Tenopir C, Birch B, Allard S. Academic libraries and research data services[J]. Library, 2012,46(3), 61–75.
[17] Wang Yuefen,XieQingnan,SongXiaokang.Review and Prospect of Overseas Research on Data Science[J].Library and Information Service,2016,60(14):5-14.
[18]PLOS’New Data Policy:Public Access to Data.[EB/OL].[2018-10-29]. https://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2014/02/24/plos-new-data-policy-public-access-data-2/.
[19]Pasquetto I V ,Randles B M , Borgman C L. On the Reuse of Scientific Data[J]. Data Science Journal, 2017, 16(8):1-9.
[20] Huang Ruhua,WangBin,ZhouZhifeng.A Study on Countermeasures for Promoting Scientific Data Sharing in China[J].Library,2014(03):7-13.