Developing library professionals: the influence of communities of practice

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

In pursuance of promoting collective learning among library professionals, this paper is aimed at discussing the knowledge sharing techniques that took place in a community of practice (CoP) which was specially set up for the library industry. The issues will highlight how best practices that are shared in these CoP workshops are ‘captured’, catalogued and accessed via online social networking tools, fostering a collaborative knowledge sharing climate. For library managers facing an array of problems which resist traditional ways of learning or a knowledge worker who wants to know ‘how do I fix things’, the CoP can be utilised as an enabling environment to seek, embrace new experiences and be an integral part of the community that is focussed on enhancing and expanding their collective awareness and capabilities. We had drawn our implementation experience from the creation of an online CoP, ‘KMaya’ (www.kmaya.com.my) for our customers who are predominantly from the library community. Our study was conducted via online observations and face-to-face discussions in exploring the trends in stimulating the creation and sharing of tacit knowledge within the user community. The main thrust of the paper will be to highlight on how a CoP can be leveraged into sharing knowledge, transfer best practices and create long-term success of libraries and library professionals who work in them.
Con el fin de promover el aprendizaje colectivo entre profesionales de las bibliotecas, este documento pretende discutir técnicas para compartir conocimiento que tuvo lugar en una comunidad de prácticas (CdP) (community of practice (CoP)), que fue especialmente preparada para el sector bibliotecario. Los asuntos tratados pondrán de relieve cómo las buenas prácticas compartidas en estos talleres CdP son 'capturadas', catalogadas y recuperadas a través de herramientas de redes sociales en línea, fomentando un clima colaborativo para compartir conocimiento. Para los gestores de biblioteca que se enfrentan a una gran variedad de problemas que resisten a las formas tradicionales de aprendizaje o para un trabajador de conocimiento que quiere saber '¿Cómo soluciono las cosas', la CdP puede utilizarse como un entorno propicio para buscar, abrazar nuevas experiencias y ser una parte integral de la comunidad centrada en mejorar y ampliar sus capacidades y conciencia colectiva. Habíamos sacado nuestra experiencia en implementación de la creación de una CdP en línea, 'KMaya' (www.kmaya.com.my) para nuestros clientes que son predominantemente de la comunidad bibliotecaria. Nuestro estudio se realizó mediante observaciones en línea y discusiones cara a cara al explorar las tendencias en estimular la creación y el intercambio de conocimiento tácito dentro de la comunidad de usuarios. La orientación principal del documento será la de destacar cómo una CdP puede aprovecharse para compartir conocimiento, transferir buenas prácticas y crear el éxito a largo plazo de las bibliotecas y profesionales bibliotecarios que trabajan en ellas.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Andrew, N., Tolson, D. & Ferguson, D. (2008). Building on Wenger: communities of practice in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 28(2), 246-252. Barab, S. A. & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Berends, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. & Kirschbaum, R. (2007). Knowledge management challenges in new business development: case study observations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(4), 314- 328. Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57. Collis, B., & Margaryan, A. (2004). Applying Activity Theory to Computer Supported Collaborative Learning and Work Based Activities in Corporate Settings. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 38-52. De Laat, M. & Boer,W. (2004). CoPs for cops: managing and creating knowledge through networked expertise. In P. Hildreth & C. Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge Networks: Innovation through Communities of Practice (pp. 58-69). Hershey: Idea Group, . 11 Gausdal, A. H. (2008). Developing regional communities of practice by network reflection: the case of the Norwegian electronics industry. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(3), 209-235. Gray, B. (2004). Informal Learning in an Online Community of Practice. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 20-35. Hara, N., Hew, K. F. (2006). A Case Study of a Longstanding Online Community of Practice Involving Critical Care and Advanced Practice Nurses. 39th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS- 39 2006) Retrieved from http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2006/2507/07/250770147a.pdf Hung, C. T., Seng, H. J. G. & Seng, K. T. (2005). A framework for fostering a community of practice: scaffolding learners through an evolving continuum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (2), 159-176. Huzzard, T. (2004). Communities of domination: Reconceptualising organisational learning and power. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(6), 350-361. Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(1), 45-60. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Malone, D. (2002). Knowledge management: a model for organizational learning. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3 (2), 111-124. Meeuwesen, B. & Berends, H. (2007). Creating communities of practices to manage technological knowledge: an evaluation study at Rolls-Royce. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3), 333-347. Robey, D., Khoo, H., & Powers, C. (2000). Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. Technical Communication, 47(1), 51-66. Sutton, L. A. (2001). The Principle of Vicarious Interaction in Computer-Mediated Communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 223-242. Norfolk, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/9534 on 5th May 2013. Swan, J. A., Scarbrough, H. & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of communities of practice in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477-497. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge, University Press. Wenger, E. & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 1, 139-145. Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework. Rapport 18, Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open Universiteit, The Netherlands. Retrieve from http://wenger- trayner.com/documents/Wenger_Trayner_DeLaat_Value_creation.pdf Wenger.E. (1998). Communities of practices: Learning as a social system. Retrieve from http://ewenger.com http://www.kmaya.com.my (accessed on 10th May 2013)