Browsing by Author "Electronic Information for Libraries (EIFL)"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Borrador de tratado sobre la preservación y briefing
    (2019-12) International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA); International Council on Archives (ICA); International Council on Museums (ICOM); Electronic Information for Libraries (EIFL); Libraries Copyright Alliance
    Esta propuesta se centra en un objetivo específico de interés público - la preservación - para el cual el riesgo de fallo de mercado es alto y el de provocar un daño a los intereses de los titulares de derechos es particularmente bajo. No se trata de un documento prescriptivo; los Estados Miembros pueden decidir cómo implementar las disposiciones en el ámbito nacional.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Draft Preservation Treaty
    (2019-09) International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA); Electronic Information for Libraries (EIFL); International Council on Archives (ICA)
    This document represents an indication of what a potential future WIPO legal instrument on preservation and access to preserved works could look like.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Draft Preservation Treaty and Briefing
    (2019-12) International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA); International Council on Archives (ICA); International Council on Museums (ICOM); Electronic Information for Libraries (EIFL); Libraries Copyright Alliance
    This proposal focuses on a specific public interest objective - preservation - for which the risk of market failure is high and that of harming the interests of rightsholders is particularly low. It is not prescriptive, allowing Member States to decide how to implement the provisions nationally.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impacts of Public Access to Computers and the Internet in Libraries
    (2022-11-12) International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA); Dresvyannikova, Valensiya; Electronic Information for Libraries (EIFL); Lipeikaite, Ugne; Petuchovaite, Ramune
    This report has been prepared within the framework of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) Dynamic Coalition on Public Access in Libraries (DC-PAL). It follows DC-PAL network consultations held in April 2021, which identified evaluation of public access to computers and internet in libraries among priorities for the DC-PAL working agenda for 2021-2022. Hence, the report offers libraries and other stakeholders an easy-to-use overview of recent evidence, good practices, and methodologies for public access impact assessment. A working version of the study was presented at the DC-PAL session of the 2021 Internet Governance Forum, on 9 December 2021, and shared for feedback and contributions from the broader internet governance community, libraries, and other stakeholders interested in public access to the internet and the role and potential of libraries for provision of public access to computers and internet. Thank you to everyone who contributed, gave feedback, and made suggestions. The Dynamic Coalition on Public Access in Libraries provides a space within the IGF to facilitate policy dialogue and action to leverage public access – shared, low-or no-cost access to the internet and ICT in libraries and similar facilities – to power digital. You are welcome to join the DC-PAL mailing list for updates and news on further work and discussions: http://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/pal-dc. Special thanks for leading the preparation of this report go to Valensiya Dresvyannikova (IFLA), Ugne Lipeikaite (EIFL) and Ramune Petuchovaite (EIFL).
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Projet de traité sur la préservation et briefing
    (2019-12) International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA); International Council on Archives (ICA); International Council on Museums (ICOM); Electronic Information for Libraries (EIFL); Libraries Copyright Alliance
    La présente proposition se concentre sur un objectif d'intérêt public spécifique - la préservation - pour lequel le risque de défaillance du marché est élevé et celui de nuire aux intérêts des titulaires de droits est particulièrement faible. Elle n'est pas normative, permettant aux États membres de décider comment mettre en œuvre les dispositions au niveau national.