Sustainable academic libraries in Australia: exploring ‘radical collaborations’ and implications for reference services
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Sustainability is a major focus in Australian academic libraries, as universities face proposals for significant regulatory change in the higher education sector. The profession has already witnessed new technologies and new service delivery models requiring rapid skills development, process re-engineering and organisational change. Academic libraries deliver increasingly large and diverse service catalogues as new opportunities arise in supporting the changing research and teaching landscapes (ACRL Top Trends 2014). Yet at the same time libraries no longer have sole authority in supporting user’s information needs and must reconsider the value of traditional services, including reference. Across the sector there are increasing calls for ‘radical collaboration’ (Neal, 2010; Anderson, 2011; Wilson, 2012) to meet this ‘challenge of abundance’ (Diaz, 2014).
Radical collaborations see the traditional notion of the academic library as an independent, self-sustaining entity set aside, in favour of new relationships between libraries and their communities (Neal, 2010). The purpose may be a shared benefit, a common goal or an intersecting mandate. These new kinds of collaborations are being suggested as the key to developing and planning the workforce of the future (Delaney & Bates, 2014), realigning services to new delivery paradigms (Wilson, 2012) and demonstrating value and impact (Creaser & Spezi, 2014).
The University of Western Australia Library has been involved in a number of collaborations with campus partners to enhance services to the University community. Several of these collaborations, one of which is described, now form an important part of the ‘reference’ function, replacing, in part, more traditional services and offering a valuable multi-faceted support structure to students.
This paper also reports the results of an exploratory study investigating the nature and prevalence of new kinds of collaborations between Australian academic libraries and their on-campus partners. Responses indicate collaborations are responding to a number of complex challenges, including augmenting traditional reference services.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Anderson, R. (2011, July). The crisis in research librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(4), 280-290.
Brabazon, T. (2014). The disintermediated librarian and a reintermediated future. Australian Library Journal, 63(3), 191-205.
Burke, L. (2008). Models of reference services in academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40(4), 269-286.
Council of Academic University Librarians. (2013). CAUL/CONZUL Top ten issues in academic libraries. Sydney: CAUL.
Creaser, C., & Spezi, V. (2014). Improving Perceptions of Value to Teaching and Research Staff: The Next Challenge for Academic Libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(3), 191-206.
Delaney, G., & Bates, J. (2014). Envisioning the academic library: a reflection of roles, relevancy and relationships. New Review of Academic Librarianship, DOI: 10.1080/13614533/2014/911194, 1-22.
Díaz, J. (2014). The Roles of Engagement at The Ohio State University Libraries: Thoughts from an Early Adopter. The Reference Librarian, 55(3), 224-233.
Giesecke, J. (2012). The value of partnerships: building new partnerships for success. Journal of Library Administration, 52, 36-52.
Kaufman, P. (2012). Let's get cozy: evolving collaborations in the 21st century. Journal of Library Administration, 52(1), 53-69.
Keller, A. (2015). Research Support in Australian University Libraries: An Outsider View. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 10.1080/00048623.2015.1009528, 1-13.
Kenney, A. (2014). Leveraging the liaison model: from defining 21st research libraries to implementing 21st century research universities. Ithaka S+R.
Menchaca, F. (2014). Start a New Fire: Measuring the Value of Academic Libraries in Undergraduate Learning. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(3), 353-367.
Neal, J. G. (2010). Advancing From Kumbaya to Radical Collaboration: Redefining the Future Research Library. Journal of Library Administration, 10.1080/01930826.2011.531642, 51(1), 66-76.
Pham, H., & Tanner, K. (2015). Collaboration between academics and library staff: a structurationist perspective. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 10.1080/00048623.2014.989661, 1-17.
Rodwell, J. & Fairbairn, L. (2008). Dangerous liaisons? Library Management, 29(1/2), 116-124.
Shumaker, D. & Talley, M. (2009). Models of embedded librarianship: Final report. Washington DC: Special Libraries Association.
Stevens, C. (2013). Reference reviewed and re-envisioned: Revamping Librarian and Desk-Centric Services with LibStARs and LibAnswers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(2), 202-214.
Tyckoson, D. A. (2012). Issues and Trends in the Management of Reference Services: A Historical Perspective. Journal of Library Administration, 10.1080/01930826.2012.707953, 52(6-7), 581-600.
University of Western Australia Student Services, Study Smarter Team. STUDYSmarter Annual Evaluation Reports 2013 and 2014 (unpublished).
Wilson, L. A. (2012). Creating Sustainable Futures for Academic Libraries, Journal of Library Administration, 10.1080/01930826.2012.630241, 52(1), 78-93.
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth, Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308-319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.