Interviews, focus groups, and social media: lessons from collaborative library ethnographies in America and Kazakhstan
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Ethnography is a way of understanding not just what people say, but what they do within their larger environment. In libraries, ethnography is used to understand how patrons interact with each other and with our information resources. Ethnographic methods includes tools such as observation, interviews, photo diaries, mapping, and in-person focus groups—and the digital age has expanded our toolkit to study users using things like digital surveys and observations.
This paper presents reflections on ethnographic and user experience projects at the National Academic Library and Nazarbayev University in Kazakhstan, and at Colby College and UC Berkeley in America, highlighting the methods used and the ways in which collaboration strengthened the outcome. A final section notes both challenges and opportunities for truly effective collaborative work—and how important collaborative study of social science research is for developing libraries that fully meet these users’ needs.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Agar, M. H.
2001 Ethnography. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes, eds. Pp. 4857-4862. New York: Pergamon.
Asher, Andrew
2013 Studying ourselves: libraries and the user experience. Presentation at the American Library Association. Chicago, IL, 30 June 2013.
Bodó, Balázs
2015 Libraries in the post-scarcity age. In Copyrighting Creativity: creative values, cultural heritage institutions and systems of intellectual property. H. Porsdam, ed. Pp. 75-92. London: Routledge.
Clark, Katie
2007 Mapping Diaries, or Where Do They Go All Day? . In Studying students: The undergraduate research project at the University of Rochester. N.F. Foster and S.L. Gibbons, eds. Pp. 48-54: ACRL.
Closet-Crane, Catherine, et al.
2009 Why study up? The elite appropriation of science, institution, and tourism as a development agenda in Maramures, Romania. Advances in Library Administration and Organization 27:221-238.
Conrad, Suzanna, and Nathasha Alvarez
2016 Conversations with Web Site Users: Using Focus Groups to Open Discussion and Improve User Experience. Journal of Web Librarianship 0(0):1-30.
Emmelhainz, Celia
2015 Online Surveys in Libraries: Getting Started. In LITAblog, 9 July, http://litablog.org/2015/07/online-surveys-in-libraries-getting-started/.
—
2015 Supporting the expatriate social scientist: Faculty research and information access in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science:1-13.
Emmelhainz, Celia, and Darya Bukhtoyarova
2012 Print or electronic? Reader perceptions of changing needs and goals in the 21st century academic library. Kitap, Uakyt, Qogam conference proceedings, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan, 2012. Vol. 2, pp. 9-17.
—
2016 "I Fell into Librarianship": Experiences of Post-Soviet Librarians at the National Academic Library in Astana, Kazakhstan. Slavic & East European Information Resources 17:1-20.
Emmelhainz, Celia, et al.
2010 Collaborative Ethics: Development and Implementation. Anthropology News 51(1):24-24.
Emmelhainz, Celia, and Jose R. Polio Canas
2016 Ethnography 101: Using focus groups to understand the library workforce. Poster presented at LAUC Annual. Merced, CA, doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3178945.v1.
Forsythe, Diana E
1999 “It's just a matter of common sense”: Ethnography as invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8(1-2):127-145.
Foster, Nancy Fried, and Susan L Gibbons
2007 Studying students: The undergraduate research project at the University of Rochester: ACRL.
Freeman, Ellen, and Marilyn R. Pukkila
2012 Faculty in the mist: ethnographic study of faculty research practices. In Participatory Design in Academic Libraries: Methods, Findings, and Implementations. Pp. 4-9. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
Hannabuss, Stuart
2000 Being there: ethnographic research and autobiography. Library Management 21(2):99-107.
Klimaszewski, Cheryl, et al.
2010 Who wins? Who loses?: Representation and “restoration” of the past in a rural Romanian community. Library Review 59(2):92-106.
Kotter, Wade R
2005 Evolving Internet reference in anthropology: What our patrons want and how we can help them find it. Journal of library administration 43(3-4):75-83.
Kuckartz, Udo, and Anne McWhertor
2014 Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Lanclos, Donna
2013 Playing with Cognitive Mapping. In Donna Lanclos--The Anthropologist in the Stacks, http://www.donnalanclos.com/?p=21, accessed 22 April 2016.
Moeran, Brian
2006 Ethnography at Work. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Naveed, Muhammad Asif
2016 Exploring Information Seeking Anxiety Among Research Students in Pakistan. Libri 66(1):73-82.
Sandstrom, Alan R, and Pamela E. Sandstrom
1995 The use and misuse of anthropological methods in library and information science research. The Library Quarterly 65(2):161-199.
Shen, Yi
2013 Information seeking in academic research: A study of the Sociology Faculty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Information technology and libraries 26(1):4-13.
Thomas, Nancy P, and James M Nyce
1998 Qualitative research in LIS: Redux: A response to a [re] turn to positivistic ethnography. The Library Quarterly 68(1):108-113.
Whipple, Mindy, and James M Nyce
2007 Community analysis needs ethnography: an example from Romania. Library Review 56(8):694-706.