What do data curators care about? Data quality, user trust, and the data reuse plan
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Data curation is often defined as the practice of maintaining, preserving, and enhancing research data for long-term value and reusability. The role of data reuse in the data curation lifecycle is critical: increased reuse is the core justification for the often sizable expenditures necessary to build data management infrastructures and user services. Yet recent studies have
shown that data are being shared and reused through open data repositories at much lower levels than expected. These studies underscore a fundamental and often overlooked challenge in research data management that invites deeper examination of the roles and responsibilities of data curators. This presentation will identify key barriers to data reuse, data quality and user trust, and propose a framework for implementing reuser-centric strategies to increase data reuse. Using the concept of a "data reuse plan" it will highlight repository-based approaches to improve data quality and user trust, and address critical areas for innovation for data curators working in the absence of repository support.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Altman, M. (2012). Mitigating threats to data quality throughout the curation lifecycle.
Curating For Quality: Ensuring Data Quality to Enable New Science. National Science
Foundation, Arlington County, VA, 1-119.
Bauer, B., Ferus, A., Gorraiz, J., Gründhammer, V., Gumpenberger, C., Maly, N & Steineder,
C. (2015). Researchers and Their Data. Results of an Austrian Survey - Report 2015.
Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.34005
Borgman, C. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059-1078.
Borgman, C. (2015a). Big data, little data, no data: scholarship in the networked world. MIT
press.
Borgman, C. (2015b). If data sharing is the answer, what is the question? ERCIM NEWS, 15.
Brown, R., Wolski, M. & Richardson, J. (2015). Developing new skills for research support
librarians. The Australian library journal, 64(3), 224-234.
Carlson, S. & Anderson, B. (2007). What are data? The many kinds of data and their
implications for data re-use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 635-
651.
Cragin, M. H., Heidorn, P. B., Palmer, C. L., & Smith, L. C. (2007). An educational program
on data curation. Retrieved from
https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/3493/ALA_STS_poster_2007.pdf
Chignard, S. (2013). A brief history of open data. Paris Tech Review, 29.
Data Seal of Approval. (2017). The core trustworthy data repository requirements. Retrieved
from https://www.datasealofapproval.org/en/information/requirements/
Digital Curation Center. (2017). What is digital curation? Retrieved May 30, 2017, from
http://www.dcc.ac.uk/digital-curation/what-digital-curation
European Commission. (2016). Guidelines on FAIR data management in Horizon 2020. Version
3.0, 26 July 2016. Retrieved December 15, 2016, from
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oadata-
mgt_en.pdf, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.004
7
Federer, L., Lu, Y., Joubert, D., Welsh, J. & Brandys, B. (2015). Biomedical data sharing and
reuse: Attitudes and practices of clinical and scientific research staff. PloS one, 10(6),
e0129506.
Kingsbury, D., Snoddy, J., & Robbins, R. (1994). Report of the Invitational DOE Workshop
on genome informatics, 26-27 April 1993, Baltimore, Maryland. Genome Informatics I:
Community Databases. Journal of Comparative Biology, 1, 173-90.
Palmer, C., Weber, N., Renear, A., & Muñoz, T. (2013). Foundations of data curation: The
pedagogy and practice of �purposeful work� with research data. Retrieved from
https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/78099/ArchivesJournal-
Weber062015.pdf
Parsons, M. A., & Duerr, R. (2005). Designating user communities for scientific data:
challenges and solutions. Data Science Journal, 4, 31-38.
Pasquetto, I., Randles, B., & Borgman, C. (2017). On the Reuse of Scientific Data. Data
Science Journal, 16.
Peer, L., Green, A., & Stephenson, E. (2014). Committing to data quality review.
International Journal of Digital Curation, 9(1), 263-291.
Tenopir, C., Talja, S., Horstmann, W., Late, E., Hughes, D., Pollock, D. & Allard, S. (2017).
Research data services in European academic research libraries. Liber Quarterly, 27(1).
Treadway, J, Hahnel, M, Leonelli, S, Penny, D, Groenewegen, D, Miyairi, N, et al. (2016).
The state of open data report. Figshare. Retrieved from:
https://figshare.com/articles/The_State_of_Open_Data_ Report/4036398.
Wouters, P. & Hack, W. (2017) Open data: The researcher perspective, CWTS, Universiteit
Leiden, Leiden. Retrieved from
https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/281920/Open-data-report.pdf
Yoon, A. (2016). Red flags in data: Learning from failed data reuse experiences. Proceedings
of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-6.
Yoon, A. (2017). Data reusers’ trust development. Journal of the Association for Information
Science and Technology, 68(4), 946-956.
Zorich, D. M. (1995). Data management: managing electronic information: data curation in
museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 14(4), 430-432.