Becoming a Learning Organization: A Case Study of the National Library and Archive of Iran
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The research explores if NLAI (National Library and Archives of Iran) has provided the proper condition to attain the goals of becoming a learning organization and build leadership from within; as well as the extent to which it is ready regarding staff's viewpoints for capturing the organizational knowledge and making it available for reuse.
The survey method is employed using an organized questionnaire based on Wick & Leon Model with 5 factors: Leadership, Assessment Program, information, Innovation, Implementation. Validity of the tool is measured through consulting some experts in knowledge and information science and management fields. Also, the Cronbach's Alpha 97% confirms the Reliability of the tool.
The population consists of all staff holding a BS degree and having 10 years work experience whom were 326staff.Among them 213 staff completed the questionnaire. Data analysis is done using one-sample t-test, independent samples t-test and ANOVA.
NLAI readiness to become a learning organization evaluated significantly high regarding vision based leadership. Whereas, having a written policy or vision reflecting organization's goals and staff awareness of their manager's vision were evaluated low with mean rates of 3.9 and 3.15 respectively. Considering assessment program, irrational expectations from people work's outcome got mean rank of 3.62 and existence of a written and clear plan for attaining organization's goals, mission and vision got 3.32.
Regarding information reception and dissemination, staff tendency to improve and update their scientific knowledge was the highest with 3.63 mean rank and information flow without paperwork and bureaucratic restrictions was the lowest. Innovation and creativity has been evaluated to be low and all the items related to this category had a mean rank below 3. Also, staff evaluation of organization administration and implementation, was in an average level.
Overall, NLAI is in a middle range of readiness to become a learning organization. The components of vision based leadership had the highest and innovation and creativity had the lowest point of achievement respectively. Therefore, the administration needs to consider more toward innovation and creativity and also implementation in NLAI. However, other components have not been fully accomplished yet.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Abdullah, K. A. S., Kassim, N. A., 2008. Perceptions of organizational learning practices among Yemeni university librarians. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 13, 77-90.
Akhavan, P., Jafari, M., 2006. Learning organization: A necessity in the KnowledgeAge. Iranian Journal of Planning, 169, 16-26.
Argyris, C.,Schön,D. A., 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective Reading. Mass: Adison Wesley.
Azargoon, M., Fahiminia, F., 2012. Factors in building a learning organization: A case study of the National Library of Iran. Iranian Journal of Bookkeeping, 23, 76-83.
Baghi, Z., 2003. Facilitators and inhibitors of becoming a learning organization: The role of culture. Master’s Thesis, University of Tehran, Tehran.
Bur Bur, A., 2006. A study of learning organization characteristics in public and private schools of Tehran. Master’s Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran.
Daft, R. L., 1998. Organization: Theory and Design. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.
Garvin, D., Edmondson, A., Gino, F., 2008. Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86, 109-116.
Haley, Q. K., 2010. The relationship between learning organization dimensions and library performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University.
Jamali, H. R.,Neshat, N., 2010. The effect of organizational climate in creativity and innovation in the National Library of Iran. Tehran: NLI.
Marquardt, M. J., 2002. Building the Learning Organization: Mastering the 5 Elements for Corporate Learning (2nd Ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing, Inc.
McLagan, P., Nel, C., 1995. The Age of Participation: New Governance for the Workplace and the World. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Michael, T.S. C., Higgins, S. E., 2002. NTU Nanyang technological university: Library as a learning organization.Libri, 52, 169‐82.
Prestoungrange, G., Sandelands, E., Teare, R., 2000.TheVirtual Learning Organization: Learning at the Corporate University Workplace Campus. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Senge, P. M., 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Senge, P. M., Sterman, J. D., 1992. Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. European Journal of Operational Research,59, 137-150.
Shahayi, B., 2005. Learning organization: A sustainable competitive advantage. Iranian Journal of Planning, 184, 26-30.
Tsang, E. W. K., 1997. Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Human Relations, 50, 73-89.
Watkins, K., Marsick, V. J., 1993.Sculpting the Learning Organization. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Wick, W., Leon, L., 1995. From ideas to action: Creating a learning organization. Human Resource Management, 34, 299-311.
Yang, B., Watkins, K. E., Marsick, V. J., 2004.The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15, 31-55.
Zietlow, G. L., 2011. High schools as learning organizations: A comparison of exemplar and underperforming high schools in Southern California using Senge's Five Key Disciplines of a learning organization. PhD Dissertation University of La Verne.