How Philosophical Theory Informs Information Literacy Practice
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
To advance information literacy (IL) practice in higher education – academic librarians can investigate the philosophical foundations and commitments we all necessarily make about what the world is and what is most meaningful. This paper will describe and contrast two such commitments, Critical Theory and phenomenography, that ground popular IL theories and practices, and how such foundational commitments can influence IL practice in higher education. Particular attention will be given to informed learning and critical IL. Accordingly, this paper argues for a simple syllogism: 1. Philosophical commitments about what the world is informs (intentionally or not) IL theory. 2. IL theory informs IL practice. 3. Therefore, philosophical commitments about the world inform IL practice. Investigating IL practice in this way has a number of benefits. Understanding the philosophical foundations of IL theory allows practitioners to apply IL more broadly and holistically across an institution. The better one can articulate what IL is and why they take a certain approach, the more convincing they can be in aligning IL with campus-wide initiatives. Additionally, a philosophical lens allows academic librarians a new way to recognize the limitations of IL practice, and could also provide new avenues for different theoretical approaches of IL to engage in better dialogue. One way to enrich IL practice is to examine the philosophical foundations of IL theory.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Baer, A. (2016). Critical pedagogy, critical conversations: Expanding dialogue about critical
library instruction through the lens of composition and rhetoric. In the Library
with the Lead Pipe? Retrieved from http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/
2016/critical-conversations/
Bohman, James (Fall 2016 Edition). Critical Theory. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/critical-theory/
Flierl, M. (2018). Information Literacy and Learning in Higher Education: A Thought Experiment. In S. Kurbanoğlu, J. Boustany, S. Špiranec, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, & L. Roy (Eds.), Workplace Information Literacy: Proceedings of the European Information Literacy Conference (pp. 625 - 633). Heidelberg: Springer.
Forster, M. (2016). Phenomenography: A methodology for information literacy research. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 48(4), 353-362.
Freire, P., & Ramos, M. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1972). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder.
Jacobs, Heidi L. M. (2013). Minding the Gaps. Communications in Information Literacy, 7(2), 128-139.
Lupton, M. (2008). Information literacy and learning. Blackwood, Australia: Auslib Press.
Maybee, C. (2018). IMPACT learning: Librarians at the forefront of change in higher education. Oxford: Chandos.
Maybee, C., Bruce, C., Lupton, M., & Rebmann, K. (2017). Designing Rich Information Experiences to Shape Learning Outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 42(12), 2373-2388.
Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography -- A Research Approach to Investigating Different Understandings of Reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28-49.
Ross, W., & Brown, L. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics (Oxford World's Classics). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.