Open Access Books: an international collaboration to explore the practical implications for librarians of increasing access to scholarly research outputs

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Open access advocacy and partnership is an established role for libraries across the world: books continue to be a challenge. Books and book chapters remain a vital output for many research areas. Open access policies have focused primarily on journal articles and serial publications, potentially creating an imbalance in the research literature freely available, and possibly having a negative impact on book publications in terms of readership and citations. Publisher permissions for journal articles can usually be accessed from Sherpa RoMEO, but book contracts continue to be a mostly hidden agreement between publisher and researcher, inaccessible to librarians who are supporting and driving the open access agenda within an institution. What are the current challenges for librarians in making academics books openly available? To what extent will this limit the mediating role of librarians in scholarly communication? Is this role sustainable? A global perspective is provided with a comparison of distinctive experiences at two leading international universities: Swansea University; and the University of Nottingham Ningbo China. Swansea University is seeking to create more open access book content in line with the United Kingdom’s Higher Education Funding Council for Education Research Excellence Framework Open Access policy. The University of Nottingham Ningbo China is seeking to maximize the dissemination and visibility of research to a global audience through open access. This paper focusses on the issues and challenges for librarians who wish to increase the number of books and book chapters available open access, including: relationships with global publishing partners; the complexity of publisher policies for books; challenging existing researcher practices; and, reskilling librarians for advocacy and influencing roles in scholarly communication. A set of recommendations is drawn from this in order to improve the library and information service roles in supporting research, publishing process and improving open access to book content.

Description

Keywords

Citation

1. Hill, S. (2018) Open access monographs in the REF. Available: http://blog.hefce.ac.uk/2018/02/23/open-access-monographs-ref-2027/ [Accessed: 1 May 2018]. 2. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2016) Consultation on the second Research Excellence Framework: Consultation December 2016/36. Available: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/2016/201636/HEFCE2016_36.pdf [Accessed: 1 February 2018]. 3. Crossick, G. (2015) Monographs and Open Access: A report to HEFCE Available: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/indirreports/2015/Monographs,and,open,access/2014_monographs.pdf [Accessed: 1 February 2018]. 4. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2017) 7. REF environment 'open research' section: 7.1. What aspects of OA should submitting unit’s include in the environment statement section titled ‘open research’? Available: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/rsrch/oa/FAQ/#text7 [Accessed: 1 June 2018]. 5. Chinese Academy of Sciences. (2014) Chinese Academy of Sciences Policy Statement on Open Access to Articles from Publicly Funded Scientific Research Projects. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. 28(3). 6. National Natural Science Foundation of China. (2014) NSFC Policy Statement on Open Access(OA) to the research publications of Its Funded Projects. Available: http://or.nsfc.gov.cn/statement [Accessed: 1 Februrary 2018]. 7. Swansea University. (2015) Swansea University Open Access Policy. Available: http://www.swansea.ac.uk/media/Swansea%20University%20Open%20Access%20Policy.pdf [Accessed: 1 June 2018]. 8. The University of Nottingham. The University of Nottingham Open Access Policy. Available: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/library/research/open-access/policy.aspx#uon [Accessed: 1 February 2018]. 9. Tanner, S. (2016) An analysis of the Arts and Humanities submitted research outputs to the REF2014 with a focus on academic books. Available: http://doi.org/doi:10.18742/RDM01-76. [Accessed: 1 February 2018]. 10. Cambridge University Press. Green open access policy for books. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/open-access-policies/open-access-books/green-open-access-policy-for-books [Accessed: 17 January 2018]. 11. Edinburgh University Press. Open Access. Available: https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/publish-with-us/open-access [Accessed: 17 January 2018]. 12. Leuven University Press. Open Access Policy. Available: http://upers.kuleuven.be/sites/upers.kuleuven.be/files/page/files/LeuvenUniversityPress_OAPolicy.pdf [Accessed: 17 January 2018]. 13. IGI Global. Open Access. Available: https://www.igi-global.com/publish/contributor-resources/open-access/ [Accessed: 17 January 2018]. 14. Permissions Helpdesk Manager, (2017) Email: Elsevier Permissions Helpdesk Manager. 2017. [Email: 10 November 2017]. 15. Brill. Open Access Publishing at Brill. Available: https://brill.com/fileasset/downloads_static/static_oabrill_oabrochure.pdf [Accessed: 1 June 2018]. 16. Brill. Rights and Permissions. Available: https://brill.com/page/RightsPermissions/rights-and-permissions#selfarchiving [Accessed: 1 June 2018]. 17. Smart, S., et al. (2016) Determining the Financial Cost of Scholarly Book Publishing. Journal of Electronic Publishing. 19(1). 18. Maron, N.L., et al., (2016) The Costs of Publishing Monographs: Toward a Transparent Methodology. 2016. Available: http://www.sr.ithaka.org/publications/the-costs-of-publishing-monographs [Accessed: 1 February 2018]. 19. Martin Paul, E., et al. (2017) Cost estimates of an open access mandate for monographs in the UK’s third Research Excellence Framework. Insights: The UKSG Journal. 30(3): pp. 89-102. 20. Policy Press. Policy on self archiving and institutional repositories. Available: http://policypress.co.uk/self-archiving [Accessed: 17 January 2018]. 21. Oxford University Press. Author Reuse and Self-Archiving. Available: https://global.oup.com/academic/rights/permissions/autperm/?lang=en&cc=cn [Accessed: 17 January 2018].