Metadata for Research Projects as Grey Node Hubs for Literature Repository
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Compared with regular publications, Information of research projects is a type of grey literature, Fortunately, many commercial or non-commercial research project databases have been used as important information resources by many research-based universities. The problem is: on one hand, though some of these research project databases include the outcome and funding information of projects, many are settled separated from the other databases even from being displayed on the website of libraries; on the other hand, much grey literature has strong relationship with one or more research projects, such as meeting or conference information, research data sets, proposals and funding information, etc.. This paper introduces research projects as grey node hubs for literature repository, and metadata of research projects under this vision.
Description
Keywords
Citation
1. Priscilla Caplan (2003). Metadata Fundamentals for All Librarians. ALA Editions, ProQuest Ebook Central. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uiuc/detail.action?docID=300 1579.
2. Andres Melgar, Linder Corro. (2016). A Framework for Organizational Memory Management of Research Projects in Institutions of Higher Education[C]. 2016 11Th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) Series: Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies.
3. Antonella Fresa, Borje Justrell, Claudio Prandoni. (2015). Digital Curation and Quality Standards for Memory Institutions: PREFORMA Research Project[J]. Archival Science, 15 (2): SI, p. 191-216.
4. Stepan Oana Maria, Lungu Mircea-Alexandru. (2015). Specific Research Projects Grant of Semantically[C]. 2nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts (SGEM 2015), Albena, Bulgaria, Aug 26-Sep 01
5. Constanze Curdt, Dirk Hoffmeister.(2015). Research Data Management Services for a Multidisciplinary, Collaborative Research Project Design and Implementation of the Tr32Db Project Database[J]. Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems, 49(4): SI, p, 494-512
6. Weisen Guo, Steven B Kraines.(2011). Discovering Relationship Associations from the Literature Related to Research Projects in Sustainability Science Using Ontology and Inference[C]. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval, Univ Paris Est Creteil, Paris, France, OCT 26-29
7. S. Shreeves, J. Riley, L. Milewicz. (2006). Moving Towards Shareable Metadata[J]. First Monday 8 (7), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i8.1386
8. John L. McCarthy. (1982). Metadata Management for Large Statistical Databases[c].The Prosceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Mexico City, Mexico, Sep 8-10
9. Becker R. A. , Chambers J. M.. Design and Implementation of the 'S' System for Interactive Data Analysis[C]. Proceedings of I.E.E.E. Compsac78, p. 626-629.
10.Teitel R. F. (1977). Relational Database Models and Social Science Computing[C]. Proceedings of Computer Science and Statistics: Tenth Annual Symposium on the Interface, Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards, p. 165-177.
11. L. Mark, N. Roussopoulos. (1986). Metadata Management[J]. Computer, 19(12), p. 26-36
12. PMD Gray, GE Storrs, JBH Duboulay. (1988). Knowledge Representations for Database Metadata[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2(1): 3-29.
13. A. Alzobaidie, JB Grimson. (1988). Use of Metadata to Drive the Interaction Between Database and Expert Systems[J]. Information and Software Technology, 30(8), p. 484-496.
14. M. Siegel, SE. Madnick. (1991).A Metadata Approach to Resolving Semantic Conflicts[C]. 17th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Location: Barcelona, Spain, Date: Sep 03-06.
15. YS Joung, JH Lim, SJ Hyun. (2001).A Metadata Repository System For an Efficient Description of Visual Multimedia Documents[J]. Concurrent Engineering-Research and Applications, 9(2), p. 93-104.
16. AKMS Islam, M. Piasecki. (2006), A Generic Metadata Description For Hydrodynamic Model Data[J]. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 8(2), p. 141-148.
17. Andras Hajdu, Charalambos Giamas, Nicholas Vretos. (2007). Metadata Description of Thermal Videos for Rescue Operations[C]. International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems, Location: Iasi, Romania, Date: JUL 12-13.
18. Hong Yao, Jinlai Xu, Zhongwen Luo. (2016). MEMoMR: Accelerate MapReduce Via Reuse of Intermediate Results[J]. Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience, 28 (14), p. 3814-3829
19. Athanasios D. Styliadis, Ipek I. Akbaylar, Papadopoulou, Despoina A.(2009). Metadata-based Heritage Sites Modeling With e-Learning Functionality[J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10(2), p. 296-312.
20. Petr Kremen, Martin Necasky,(2019). Improving Discoverability of Open Government Data With Rich Metadata Descriptions Using Semantic Government Vocabulary[J]. Journal Of Web Semantics, 55, p. 1-20.
21. Xiaobin Li, Peijie Zhuang, Chao Yin. (2019). A Metadata Based Manufacturing Resource Ontology Modeling in Cloud Manufacturing Systems[J]. Journal Of Ambient Intelligence And Humanized Computing, 10(3-special: SI), p. 1039-1047
22. Grace Therrell. (2019). More Product, More Process: Metadata in Digital Image Collections[J]. Digital Library Perspectives, 35(1), p. 2-14.
23. Qingfang He. (2017). Quanqiu Keyan Xiangmu Shujuku Yingyong Yu Xueke Jianshe Youxiao Lujing Zhi Tansuo[R].