Performance Optimisation in Sharing Big Geoscience Data
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Online Geoscience data sharing plays a key role in enabling organizations to make informed decisions. Geoscience data covers both spatial and non-spatial datasets. To maximize the benefits, structured data workflows and frameworks governing the data has to be continually experimented. Reproducibility of enhanced frameworks driving defined data provenance that govern the datasets enables efficiency of improved data. However, achieving data sharing of multiple geoscience datasets with different provenance in practice is problematic – previous findings signify issues of approaches used to outline data visualization due to uncontrolled changes on the input data used, internet of things (IoT) devises and algorithms used in ascertaining data correctness. The resulting problems fall within the category of big data issues. In this paper we present a framework that addresses geoscience big data solutions through data visualization based on the structured datasets. The framework is such that it addresses performance optimization, data input correctness and redundancy. The resulting approach is not constrained by the type of data format or size. The results are evaluated through an extensive set of experiments that validate the approach and highlight the key benefits of the proposed framework. This included ways of reducing data redundancy and correctness based on visualization approach.
Description
Keywords
Citation
1. A. K. Daniel, P. Christian, and S. Mike, “Visual Data Mining of Large Spatial Data Sets”.2004.
2. A. K. Daniel and M. Ward. “Visual Data Mining Techniques, Book Chapter in: Intelligent
Data Analysis, an Introduction: by D. Hand and M. Berthold”, Springer Verlag, 2 edition, 2002.
A. K. Daniel. “Visual exploration of large databases”, Communications of the ACM, 44(8):38-44, 2001.
3. A. K. Daniel A., et al. "Challenges in visual data analysis." Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06). IEEE, 2006.
4. B. Shneiderman. “The eye have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Visual Languages”, 1996.
5. Barik et al. 2017. “Investigation into the efficacy of geospatial big data visualization tools. International Conference on Computing”, Communication and Automation (ICCCA2017).
D. Laney. “3D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume, Velocity, and Variety. Application Delivery Strategies”. 2001.
6. K. R Barik, Dubey, Harishchandra, A. B Samaddar, R. D Gupta, and P. K Ray, “FogGIS: Fog Computing for Geospatial Big Data Analytics,” 3rd IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Electronics, 2016.
7. K. Wadhwani, “Big Data Challenges and Solutions”, Technical Report, DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16548.88961. 2017.
8. K. Evangelidis, K. Ntouros, S. Makridis, and C. Papatheodorou, “Geospatial services in the cloud,” Computers and Geosciences, Vol. 63, pp. 116–122, 2014.
9. N. M Van, H. J Scholten and R Van de Velde, “Geospatial technology and the role of location in science,” Springer Netherlands; 2009.
10. P. Vickers, Member, IET Joe Faith, and Nick Rossiter. “Understanding Visualization: A Formal Approach using Category Theory and Semiotics”, 2013
R. Vaughan, “Conceptual Framework”. 2008.
11. S. Li, S. Dragicevic, F. A. Castro, M. Sester, S. Winter, A. Coltekin, C. Pettit, B. Jiang, J. Haworth, A. Stein and T. Cheng. “Geospatial big data handling theory and methods: A review and research challenges,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 115, pp.119-133, 2016.