Identifying, discovering and marketing grey literature in Science in the English-speaking Caribbean: A Case Study of Jamaica’s Scientific Information Units
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The English-speaking Caribbean produces its fair share of grey literature to the global scientific community. However, it has been a great challenge for information seeking communities to acquire and create access to these Caribbean resources. This research identified the factors contributing to the status of grey literature in Science in the English-speaking Caribbean, in particular Jamaica, and raises the profile by advocating for its proper organisation, greater accessibility, and marketing. It is a mixed method survey of twenty one (21) librarians working in information units that disseminate science information within the Scientific and Technical Information Network (STIN) in Jamaica. Fourteen (14) of twenty one (21) librarians participated in the survey. The findings indicate that the majority of them were very knowledgeable about grey literature. The institutions that they worked in were all producers of grey literature and their clients used it in the execution of their job functions. The majority found it challenging to access grey literature from their own organizations. Seventy five percent (75%) of the participants believed that lack of organisation contributed to the limited use of grey literature in Jamaica. The sharing of information was also identified as a cultural problem. All fourteen (14), one hundred percent (100%) indicated that they would be willing to join a team to organize grey literature and sixty two percent (62%) felt that grey literature should find its way into databases and another thirty eight percent (38%) felt it should be made visible on websites. Ninety three percent (93%) supported the use of seminars, workshops, public media and advocacy as strategies to raise awareness of the value of and to encourage the use of grey literature. The literature also supported the use of digitization as a means of raising awareness through greater access and inevitable exposure of their value to users.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Adams RJ, Smart P and Huff AS (2017) Shades of grey: Guidelines for working with grey literature
in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. International Journal of
Management Reviews 19: 432-454. DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12102
Bailin A and Grafstein A (2010a) The dissemination of research. In: The Critical
Assessment of Research: Traditional and New Methods of Evaluation. Cambridge: Woodhead
Publishing, pp.63-84.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9781843345435/the-critical-assessment-of-research
Bailin A and Grafstein A (2010b) Moving beyond the gold standards: tools and
techniques. In: The Critical Assessment of Research: Traditional and New Methods of Evaluation. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, pp.85-89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9781843345435/the-critical-assessment-of-research
Bandara SB (1987) Grey literature in the CARICOM Region. Revista Aibda, 8(1): 1-14.
Bartolini R, Pardelli G and Goggi S et al. (2017) A terminological ‘journey’ in the grey literature
domain. CNR, Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell’Informazione. A. Faedo, Italy: 117-130.
Conn VS, Valentine JC and Cooper HM et al. (2003) Grey literature in meta-analyses. Nursing
Research 52: 256-261.
Corlett RT (2011) Trouble with Gray Literature. Biotropica, 43(1): 3-5.
Farace DJ and Schöpfel J (2010) Grey literature in library and information studies. Berlin:
DeGruyter Saur.
Ferraro PJ and Pattanayak SK (2006) Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of
biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biology 4: c105.
Genovesi P (2005) Eradications of invasive alien species in Europe: A review. Biological Invasions 7:
217-133.
GreyNet International (2018) Grey literature. http://www.greynet.org/
Jeffery KG (2000) An architecture for grey literature in a R & D context.
International Journal on Grey Literature 1: 64-72.
Jennions MD and Moller AP (2002) Publication bias in ecology and evolution: An empirical
assessment using the ‘trim and fill’ method. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 77: 211-222.
Lipinski TA and Kritikos KC (2018) How open access policies affect access to grey literature
in university digital repositories: A case study of iSchools. Grey Journal.
Mahood Q, Van Eerd D and Irwin E (2014) Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews:
Challenges and benefits. Research Synthesis Methods 5(3): 221-234.
DOI.10.1002/jrsm.1106.
Mason M (2019) Grey Literature: History, Definition, Acquisition, and Cataloguing
http://www.moyak.com/papers/grey-technical-literature.html
Naimpally A, Ramachandran H and Smith C (2012) Designing Information
Literacy Assignments. In: Lifelong Learning for Engineers and Scientists in the Information Age. California: Elsevier Incorporation, pp.31-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2010-0-67009-X
Osayande O and Ukpebor CO (2012) Grey literature acquisition and management: Challenges in
academic libraries in Africa. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/700
Paez A (2017) Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. Journal of
Evidence-Based Medicine 10:233–240. https://doi.orr/10.1111/jebm.12266
Rucinski TL (2015) The elephant in the room: Toward a definition of grey legal
literature. Law Library Journal 107(4): 543-559. http://www.aallnet.org/mm/Publications/llj/LLJ-Archives/Vol-107/no-4/2015-26.pdf
Salmon F and Smart C (2012) The role of the academic library in facilitating scholarly
communication. Caribbean Quarterly 58 (2-3): 67-78.
Shieber S and Suber P eds (2017) Good practices for university open-access policies
(wiki). Harvard Open Access Project. Retrieved from bit.ly/goodoa.
Shieber S and Suber P eds (2015) Good practices for university open-access
policies. Harvard Open Access Project. https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/sites/hoap/images/Bestpracticesguide-2013.pdf.
Shieber S and Suber P eds (2013) Good practices for university open-access
policies. Harvard Open Access Project.
https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/sites/hoap/images/Bestpracticesguide-2013.pdf.
Simberloff D (2009) We can eliminate evasions or live with them: Successful management projects.
Biological Invasions 11: 149-157.
Soomai SS, Wells PG and MacDonald BH (2011) Multi-stakeholder
perspectives on the use and influence of "grey" scientific information in fisheries management. Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1): 50-62. https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/271824/
Stokes EJ, Strindberg S and Bakabana PC et al. (2010) Monitoring great ape and elephant
abundance at large spatial scales: Measuring effectiveness of a conservation landscape. PLoS