Research on Cooperation between the Academic Library and Research Team: Taking the Life & Medical Sciences Subject Team of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library as an Example

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Under the ubiquitous knowledge environment, academic libraries are developing cooperation in the entire knowledge creation lifecycle. The Life & Medical Sciences subject team of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library (LMSST) has extensively executed its subject services since 2008 and built a good relationship with the research teams. This paper deeply expounds three cooperation modes driven by needs as follows: 1) Micro level: Subject librarians focus on individual information literacy (IL) capacity and provide information literacy improvement supports, students, teachers and researcher’s partners-enterprise employee were included as the training targets; Case 1: Cooperate to hold the “Big Data Training” summer camp, combine the research direction, cultivate research teams data awareness, data usage skills and data mining ability; Case 2: Provide information literacy supports for Innovation Alliance of Nano-medical Diagnostic Technology. 2) Meso level: Subject librarians embedded information service in the research project as the role of “information worker”. Case 3: Subject team integrated into Metabolic Science Discipline Development Strategy Research Group, assist the researchers that study in the new discipline to fully grasp the discipline situation. 3) Macro-level: Subject librarians support managers of research team to make decision based on scientific intelligence analysis. Case 4: Pharmacological and Toxicological Contribution Analysis Report of ESI in the school of Pharmacy. This paper aims to provide a reference for the cooperation between academic libraries and research teams.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Attis, D., & Koproske, C. (2013). Thirty trends shaping the future of academic libraries. Learned Publishing, 26(1), 18-23. doi:10.1087/20130104 Brandt, D. S. (2007). Librarians as partners in e-research. College & Research Libraries News, 68(6), 365-396. doi:10.5860/crln.68.6.7818 Carlson, J., & Kneale, R. (2011). Embedded librarianship in the research context: Navigating new waters. 2011, 72(3), 4. doi:10.5860/crln.72.3.8530 Federer, L. (2013). The librarian as research informationist: a case study. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 298-302. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.011 Janke, R., & Rush, K. L. (2014). The academic librarian as co-investigator on an interprofessional primary research team: a case study. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 31(2), 116-122. doi:10.1111/hir.12063 LaGuardia, C. (2012). Library Instruction in the Digital Age. Journal of Library Administration, 52(6-7), 601-608. doi:10.1080/01930826.2012.707956 Manus, S. J. B. (2009). LIBRARIAN IN THE CLASSROOM: AN EMBEDDED APPROACH TO MUSIC INFORMATION LITERACY FOR FIRST-YEAR UNDERGRADUATES. Notes, 66(2), 249-261. doi:10.1353/not.0.0259 Mounce, M. (2009). Academic librarian and English composition instructor collaboration: A selective annotated bibliography 1998‐2007. Reference Services Review, 37(1), 44-53. doi:10.1108/00907320910934986 O'Connor, L., Bowles-Terry, M., Davis, E., & Holliday, W. (2010). "Writing Information Literacy" Revisited Application of Theory to Practice in the Classroom. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 49(3), 225-230. doi:10.5860/rusq.49n3.225 Pinfield, S., Cox, A., & Rutter, S. (2017). Mapping the future of academic libraries: A report for SCONUL. Thompson, G. B. (2002). Information Literacy Accreditation Mandates: What They Mean for Faculty and Librarians. Library Trends, 51(2), 218. Xiao, J. (2010). Integrating information literacy into Blackboard: Librarian‐faculty collaboration for successful student learning. Library Management, 31(8/9), 654-668. doi:10.1108/01435121011093423